Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Recruitment Centre/Recruiter Central/Archives/Sssssss340

 Status:  In progress

 Date Started:  3 January 2014

 Date Ended: 

 Recruiter:  Royroydeb

Step One
You first go through WP:Good article criteria and WP:What the Good article criteria are not, then I will proceed.RRD13 (talk) 07:22, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

I have read the two pages sssssss340 05:09, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Step Two
Now, I will be taking a quiz. You need to score at 80% to pass.
 * 1) What does "broad in coverage means" ?
 * 2) Can an article be failed only because it is not well illustrated?
 * 3) What do you mean by "original research" ?
 * 4) When we can strip off an article of its GA position?
 * 5) Suppose in an article (regarding a person), vital information which defames the person is missing.Can that article be a GA?If not why?
 * 6) What does "stable" mean?RRD13 (talk) 08:35, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Here are my answers: sssssss340 02:47, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) A article is broad in coverage if it only provides the necessary information, no more, no less
 * No, illustrations are not required if there are none readily available. However, illustrations can greatly improve most articles and should be added if there are illustrations readily available.
 * 1) Research not verifiable by a reliable published source
 * 2) At any point at which it no longer represents the level of quality that is expected of a good article.
 * No, the article must provide all information to maintain a neutral stance.
 * 1) There should not be a active Editing War or content dispute, however vandalism, proposals, and copy edits are not qualifiers for instability.

You have given 5 correct answers so you percentage is 84%. Congratulations! You have passed the test.
 * 1) Ok! Its correct.
 * 2) Yes!
 * 3) Yes!
 * 4) Partially true. It is when someone seeks a reassesment of the article or the article becomes a Featured Article.
 * 5) Very Good!
 * 6) Correct

Step Three
Now how we can continue is entirely upto you. Firstly I would like to ask you if you have any doubts in anywhere, then you are welcomed to ask me. After that take a nomination at here and I will supervise how you do. RRD13 (talk) 04:24, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

I have taken the nomination at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAS_(software) sssssss340 12:53, 13 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Once you keep put on your reviews, User:sssssss340, keep the article on hold for 7 days. If nothing satisfactory occurs during the time period then prematurely fail the article. RRD13 (talk) 04:27, 21 January 2014 (UTC)