Wikipedia:WikiProject Hotels/Assessment

This is the WikiProject Hotels assessment summary page. See WP:1.0 and WP:WVWP for more information.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the WikiProject Hotels project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Hotels articles by quality and Category:Hotels articles by importance, which serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

FAQ

 * 1. How do I add an article to the WikiProject? : Just add WikiProject Hotels to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.
 * 2. Someone put a WikiProject Hotels template on an article, but it's not a Hotels related topic. What should I do? : Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them.  If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the talk page of this department (or directly with the person who tagged the article).
 * 3. What is the purpose of the article ratings? : The objective of the rating system is twofold. First, it allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles.  Second, the ratings will be used by the Wikipedia 1.0 project to compile a "released version" of Wikipedia that can be distributed to readers.  Please note, however, that these ratings are meant for the internal use of the project, and do not imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole.
 * 4. How can I get an article rated? : Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
 * 5. Who can assess articles? : Any member of the Hotels WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
 * 6. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? : Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
 * 8. What if I don't agree with a rating? : You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
 * 9. Aren't the ratings subjective? : Yes, they are (see, in particular, the disclaimers on the importance scale), but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
 * 10. How can I keep track of changes in article ratings? : A full log of changes over the past thirty days is available here. If you are just looking for an overview, however, the monthly statistics may be more accessible.
 * 11. What if I have a question not listed here? : If your question concerns the article assessment process specifically, please refer to the discussion page; for any other issues, you can go to the main project discussion page.

Requests for assessment
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.


 * Hotel Polen fire I gave it a start class rating myself but I believe it is beyond that. Please asses. SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 02:15, 12 December 2011 (UTC)


 * InterContinental Marseille Hotel Dieu Relatively new page, so it hasn't been assigned ratings yet - it'd be very helpful if someone would rate it! Thanks, EmperorNapoléonI (talk) 00:42, 2 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Motel is currently rated "start class" and "top importance" in both WP Hotels and Travel and Tourism. I've tried to flesh it out a bit, as this is supposedly a key topic, but am unsure on a few points - namely the significant overlap between the 'history' and 'timeline' sections of the article as well as the question of how much weight to give to the decline of these properties. Many have gone badly downhill or closed outright as old roads are bypassed by freeway and independents driven out of the motel industry by increased competition from hotel chains. While there are some egregious instances of once-modern (1950's or 1960's) motel strips turning into crime-ridden slums (Seattle's Aurora Avenue (US 99, bypassed by I-5 in 1968) being one prime example) it would seem many of these properties are just small country roadside small businesses which slowly fade away as the original owners retire and the business is no longer profitable. The text does seem a bit repetitive in places, too. It is also prone to say the same things twice. 66.102.83.61 (talk) 20:53, 26 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Carlton Hotels & Suites needs to be rated MarkTHE19 (talk) 07:25, 14 December 2021 (UTC)