Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/Non-free

WikiProject Fair use seeks to aid the English Wikipedia by improving and monitoring its invocation of the "fair use" clause of U.S. copyright law towards the use of copyrighted media, with the goal of preventing unnecessary and inappropriate copyright infringement, which could potentially cause all sorts of legal trouble for our beloved encyclopedia.

Goals
Current Goals for March 2012:
 * Revive the Wikiproject
 * Create a legal precedent section for reference
 * Update terms related to Copyright/Copyleft/CC
 * Write guides on Fair Use

Previous activity
The current guidelines for non-free content on Wikipedia, though written about at length on various project pages, does not seem to translate well into actual practice: many images are labeled as "fair use" without any deliberation, and many such images labeled would probably not be judged as "fair use" in a court of law. As of August 2005, the English Wikipedia has over 14,000 images tagged as "fair use", and if even a small percentage of those are copyright violations, the consequences could be unpleasant.

The goals of the policy reform are as follows:


 * Develop new fair use image copyright tags. Many of the current image copyright tags for "fair use" are short blanket statements which encourage legally incorrect thinking about fair use. Some suggested general improvements:
 * The tags should be more detailed, stating the rationale for fair use and implicitly defining what is and what is not fair use.
 * They should be comprehensible to the average Wikipedian who neither knows nor cares much about the structure of U.S. copyright law.
 * They should emphasize use and not medium.
 * They should allow anyone who cares to help monitor proper use to quickly judge whether or not the use is "fair" or if it is copyright infringement.
 * It should be noted (if not on the tags, then somewhere else) that it is best to use a free alternative if one is available. This is not strictly a requirement of "fair use", but the avoidance of a potential copyright situation is always better for the goals of Wikipedia (both in avoiding lawsuits, as well as creating a "free encyclopedia").
 * Where appropriate, separate tags should be created for common "fair uses", such as using a book cover to illustrate an article about said book.
 * They should clearly state that the work in question is copyrighted, and require the user to label the copyright source as best as is known.
 * They should clarify that U.S. copyright law matters in particular because the images are hosted on a U.S. servers.
 * They should provide reusers with information to help them decide whether their use is "fair" or not. A large part of our invocation of "fair use" is because our site is educational in purpose and run by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, and that our invocation of "fair use" for our use of the image might not apply to other uses (that is, third parties can't "piggyback" on our "fair use" claims).  Where practical, they should also provide information on other conditions under which the image may be redistributed or information on obtaining a licence to redistribute it.
 * Elimination of blanket "fair use" tags which have no applicability towards "use" which is different than a generic "fair use" tag.


 * Develop a system for monitoring and verifying "fair use" images. Because "fair use" is based on use rather than media, it is impossible to set up a system which will permanently guarantee that any particular image will be used in a "fair" way &mdash; for example, the use of an image of Mickey Mouse could be "fair" in an article on the character himself, but the use of it on an article about mice in general would probably not be "fair". Something judged "fair" at one point could easily be used for infringement at a later date. Nevertheless, a good number of the images uploaded are unlikely to be "fair use" in any context, and these are worth weeding out immediately. Possible ways for this system could include:
 * The use of specialized templates to indicate when an image has or has not been reviewed by another Wikipedian (associated with this project or not).

Fair use should also be reviewed in featured articles.


 * Improve guidelines. At present, the guidelines are complex, and derive from mutltiple sources that are not fully publicized, with the result that people who do not understand copyright issues are, out of ignorance, uploading material for which there is no plausible fair use rationale. There exists a further concern that material which could fall within Non-free content criteria lacks proper rationales, attribution, or other necessary information and is therefore eligible for deletion.

Sub-pages
These pages were for working on specific goals. Many have now been achieved.
 * /Fair use tag reform &mdash; to keep track of which tags have been rewritten, which ones have not.
 * /Fair use rationale &mdash; to develop a set of stock rationale for each image template, which can be linked to from them at some point in the future.
 * /Monitoring &mdash; to develop a means of reviewing fair use claims
 * /Preemptive fair use &mdash; for further articulating Wikipedia's unique "preemptive" strategy of tagging things as "fair use", with the goal of potentially making a concrete policy proposal.
 * /Explaining fair use &mdash; for developing resources to help Wikipedia users unfamiliar with copyright law understand the basics of "fair use" in an easy and practical sense.
 * /Todo &mdash; Want to help? Here are some open tasks.  Feel free to add tasks of your own that are related to the project.
 * /Fair use image sorting - Help sort images tagged with fairuse into more specific categories

Useful templates

 * Non-free use rationale – to facilitate creating a non-free or fair use media rationale.
 * Generally see Category:Non-free use rationale templates

Useful tags
Review tags:
 * fairusereview – to mark questionable images for review
 * dfu – to actively dispute fair use claims for review by an admin after seven days
 * reviewedfairuse – to mark images which have been independently reviewed and deemed likely to be fair use

Image changing: Deletion tags:
 * fairusereduce – for large images which should be reduced in size and/or quality.
 * fairusereplace – for images which could be reasonably re-created/replaced with free alternatives.
 * – for images which have been reduced in size/quality and have previous versions which require deletion. (Also for non-free images replaced by free images.)
 * – for orphaned fair use images that have not been replaced.
 * Image:Image.ext – for orphaned fair use images that have been replaced by a free image
 * – for images without a fair use rationale listed (for images uploaded after May 4 2006)
 * – for images without a licence listed
 * – for images without a source listed

Useful external resources

 * "Fair Use of Copyrighted Materials" is a wonderful little primer on "fair use" provided by the University of Texas.
 * Summaries of Fair Use cases from Stanford University. Very useful for determining previous case law on a given topic.

Userbox
Participants may add this to their userpage.

If you prefer not to use userboxes, you may add yourself directly to Category:WikiProject Fair use participants by placing the following code on your Userpage:

If you'd like to be kept abreast of proposals and decisions, please add your name below. At this early stage, none of the above ideas have been implemented in a major way, but will be discussed on the talk page of this project. Feel free to add this page to your watchlist if you'd like to keep up with the smaller changes.

Editors willing to help
-- ۩ M ask  23:47, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Fastfission 01:07, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Phroziac (talk) 01:21, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
 * nixie 06:15, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Geni
 * [[smoddy ]] 16:07, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Zeimusu | (Talk page)
 * Carnildo
 * Laura Scudder | Talk 21:10, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
 * the wub  "?/!"  21:48, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
 * OtherDave | Talk 18:37, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * JYolkowski // talk
 * Sarge Baldy 05:43, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The Uninvited Co., Inc.
 * Zscout370 (Sound Off)
 * Bovlb 04:29:42, 2005-09-01 (UTC)
 * Jacoplane 18:45, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Justinc 13:11, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Rossrs 13:55, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * &mdash;Morven 23:01, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Shimgray 23:48, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Tabor 21:10, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Wikiacc (talk)
 * AaronSw 23:06, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Jkelly 02:05, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Mwanner | Talk 21:14, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Physchim62 (talk)
 * +MATIA &#9742; 13:41, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Hiding talk 13:57, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
 * feydey 04:10, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Stan 23:38, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Travb 15:07, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
 * – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 01:10, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * VegaDark 03:47, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Admrb♉ltz (T | C)
 * - Stephanie Daugherty (Triona) - Talk - Comment - 12:12, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Wgfinley 22:46, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 09:12, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
 * kjetil_r 03:42, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Tempshill 23:20, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Abu Badali 14:30, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * cohesion 06:18, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Angr (t • c) 13:39, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Jusjih 07:15, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * GChriss 21:44, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * (ESkog)(Talk) 06:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 *  howch e  ng   {chat} 00:07, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * — xaosflux  Talk  04:13, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Meegs
 * Garion96 (talk) 02:23, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * BigDT 18:54, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Johntex\talk 00:03, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Redkern
 * Andrew Levine
 * Fred-Chess 10:29, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * -- Lost(talk) 10:31, 26 August 2006
 * rjensen
 * PaulLev 17:17, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Nilfanion (talk) 00:33, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Megapixie 08:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Nil Einne 14:34, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Stick Fig 09:32, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Tvccs 06:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Hackajar 05:26, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Jeff 06:06, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * lquilter 22:35, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 23:25, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * MECU ≈ talk 00:20, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Cavenba 20:31, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Addhoc 10:45, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Cyde Weys 15:18, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * ElinorD (talk) 09:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * nadav 23:30, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Spike Wilbury 20:12, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * &mdash; Gaff ταλκ 00:39, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Butseriouslyfolks 17:31, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * -Flubeca (t) 23:37, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * CJ Marsicano 00:09, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Wikidemo 26 June 2007
 * Andrew c 20:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
 * AchedDamiman
 * Calliopejen1 04:11, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Amadscientist 09:28, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Chris.B 09:31, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Shell babelfish 21:27, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Sue Wallace 15:48, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * --Padraic 21:33, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 *  ARkY //  ¡HaBLaR!  22:00, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 *  Lara  ❤  Love 
 * jonny - m t  03:45, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Tvol (talk) 04:52, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * —  Κ aiba  12:13, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Vivio Testa rossa  Talk Who 00:07, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * LegoKontribsTalkM 00:48, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
 * ~  JohnnyMrNinja  06:17, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * DocKino (talk) 17:57, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * — Ched : ?  02:00, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 *  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 21:17, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * ChrisGualtieri (talk) 06:26, 7 March 2012 (UTC)