Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam/Assessment

Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject Islam! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia articles related to Islam. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work. The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the WikiProject Islam project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Islam-related articles by quality, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Frequently asked questions

 * How do I add an article to the WikiProject? : Just add WikiProject Islam to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.
 * How can I get my article rated? : Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
 * Who can assess articles? : Any member of WikiProject Islam is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
 * What if I don't agree with a rating? : You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
 * Aren't the ratings subjective? : Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Requesting an assessment
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use the peer review department (not yet available) instead. Please archive requests that are complete.

New requests
Please place new requests (in the format, # article name -- ~ ) at the bottom of the list.


 * Nizari, a new rating and feed back would be appreciated. (Water Stirs (talk) 11:06, 3 April 2009 (UTC))


 * Said Nursi A new rating and feedback will be appreciated. rinduzahid (talk) 15:25, 5 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Al-Fatiha Significantly added to the quality of the article, would appreciate quick assessment.HQEditor (talk) 15:14, 18 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Fitna_(word) Completely rewrote the article. -- Dmvjjvmd (talk) 03:15, 9 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Muslim ibn al-Hajjaj Rated stub class, but easily comprehensive enough for start. -- 72.83.246.25 (talk) 21:08, 10 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Abu Hanifa Mosque -- I would appreciate if this article gets reassessed because it was completely rebuilt and so much information was added tio it. Hashima20 (talk) 20:32, 9 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Jizya -- New rating required. Article needs attention from other experts. Reeves.ca (talk) 03:07, 21 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Hui_pan-nationalism - a new rating and feedback would be greatly appreciated Linnea2853 (talk) 07:05, 25 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Jama Masjid, Delhi - a mosque article recently added to Wikiproject Islam. Though it has a good article rating from other projects, it is unassessed by this project. Gowhk8 (talk) 14:36, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * how do you think this one? It seem it received GA in another Wikiprojects, but i think there is still lack some inline citations. Ahendra (talk) 23:49, 14 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Luqman - Attempted to improve the quality of the article. A new rating and feedback would be greatly appreciated. Jazakumullahu Khayr. -- Sulṭān ʿAbdullāh al-Hindi Talk 16:14, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello The article structure is good for starter article. However, there are several issues as it seems Luqman still lacked in-line citation for references. there should be more renowned reliable references to be included in this article.Ahendra (talk) 23:26, 14 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Jama Mosque, Bijapur - Article has changed significantly since last rating in 2012, and received reassessment from other projects; it is however still classified as a stub by Wikiproject Islam, so requesting reassessment. Gowhk8 (talk) 22:24, 11 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Rahmah el Yunusiyah - recent article co-developed between me and another user; with some content taken and sourced from the ID wiki. I would be curious if anyone can check if I have the correct interpretation (and wikilinks) for some of the Islam related content and if possible give her obviously Arabic-derived name in Arabic at the top of the article. She was known in Egypt and some Islamic circles so I suspect the correct spelling must be out there in plenty of places. --Dan Carkner (talk) 16:46, 13 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Friday prayer attempted to simplify and clarify the practice. Need some help for accuracy checking and cleanup on second half of article. Jmjosh90    02:49, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Instructions
An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the WikiProject Islam template banner on its talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax).



The following values may be used for the class parameter:


 * [[Image:Featured article star.png|16px]]FA (adds articles to Category:FA-Class Islam-related articles)
 * [[Image:Featured article star.png|16px]]FL (adds articles to Category:FL-Class Islam-related articles)
 * A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Islam-related articles)
 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|14px]] GA (adds articles to Category:GA-Class Islam-related articles)
 * B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Islam-related articles)
 * C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Islam-related articles)
 * Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Islam-related articles)
 * Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Islam-related articles)
 * NA (for pages, such as templates or disambiguation pages, where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:Non-article Islam-related pages)

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Islam-related articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

The following values may be used for the importance parameter:


 * Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Islam-related articles)
 * High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Islam-related articles)
 * Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Islam-related articles)
 * Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Islam-related articles)

The parameter is not used if an article's class is set to NA, and may be omitted in those cases. The importance should be assigned according to the importance scale below.

Participants
Please feel free to add your name to this list if you would like to join the assessment team (sign with (3) instead of ~ (4)).
 * Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk)
 * HassenIqbal192 
 * ITAQALLAH 
 * Striver
 * Badbilltucker
 * Kkrystian
 * -- TruthSpreader reply 07:27, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Miraculousrandomness 08:59, 17 January 2007 (UTC) (3)
 * Aphreydus
 * Sa.vakilian
 * Bless sins (talk)
 * - Voidz  (t·c)
 * Peter Deer (talk)
 * Euryalus (talk)
 * leahtwosaints (talk)
 * Samar (Talk  . Contributions )
 * Worlingham (talk)
 * Meltona11
 * User:JigglyfiddersJigglyfidders (talk)
 * EuroPride (talk) 13:48, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * --Simha (talk)
 * --Imadjafar (talk)
 * --Mpolat (talk)
 * A.A.Wasif | Talk
 * - Ascetic Rosé
 *  ~Mohammad Hossain~ 
 * Ahendra (talk) 11:08, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Muhammadahmad79 (talk)
 * Dhoru 21 (talk・contribs)

Log
The full log of assessment changes for the past thirty days is available here.