Wikipedia:WikiProject Kurdistan/Assessment

Welcome to the assessment department of the Kurdistan WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles about the Kurdistan, its governments, people, geography, and history. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the WPKU project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Kurdistan articles by quality and Category:Kurdistan articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Frequently asked questions

 * How can I get my article rated? : Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
 * Who can assess articles? : Any member of the Kurdistan WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
 * What if I don't agree with a rating? : You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
 * Aren't the ratings subjective? : Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions
Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Kurdistan articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

Importance scale
The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of the Kurdistan.

''Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.''

Importance assessment
An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the WP Kurdistan project banner on its talk page:



The following values may be used for importance assessments:
 * Top - The article is about one of the core topics of the Kurdistan. Adds articles to Category:Top-importance Kurdistan articles
 * High - The article is about the most well-known or culturally or historically significant aspects of the Kurdistan. Adds articles to Category:High-importance Kurdistan articles
 * Mid - The article is about a topic within the field that may or may not be commonly known outside the Kurdistan community. Adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Kurdistan articles
 * Low - The article is about a topic that is highly specialized within the field of Kurdistan studies and is not generally common knowledge outside that community. Adds articles to Category:Low-importance Kurdistan articles

Requesting an assessment
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

Could someone please asses the rating of Arbil FC as I have considerbly changed it and added a lot of new information. talk) 00:10, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Assessment log

 * The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.

Arbil Fc
 * Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Kurdistan articles by quality log

Worklist

 * The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.


 * Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Kurdistan articles by quality