Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Newsletter/July 2020


 * Issue 2&mdash;July 2020


 * WikiProject Medicine Newsletter

A happy Juneteenth, Canada day, and July 4th to all. During tumultuous times, at least the newsletter returns. The newsletter remains experimental; if you have ideas, suggestions, or criticisms, please post them at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine/Newsletter. With that, here's what is happening this month:

News from around the site
 * Calling all reviewers! A rush of good article nominations has filled the WP:GAN queue. Anyone can review a nomination against the good article criteria; see the instructions here for details. If you have questions about reviewing or would like some supervision as you get started, feel free to post at WT:GAN or my talk page. Happy reviewing!
 * The arbitration committee is hosting a large anti-harrassment RfC. Feedback from a broad swath of the community would be helpful.

Discussions of interest
 * A question regarding incorporating machine-readable disease codes into more medical articles is still ongoing at at VPP
 * More eyes are needed to review some class-created medical pages; list at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine.

For a list of ongoing discussions in WP:MED-tagged articles, see WikiProject Medicine/Discussions Also, a reminder to see Article Alerts for a list of medicine-related AfDs, CfDs, merge discussions, and more!

Let's hook some new editors According to at least one metric (scroll to the bottom of this signpost article for a brief explanation) total edit levels are higher than they've been in a decade. By |bar|all|~total|monthly another metric they've at least substantially spiked over the last few months. The encyclopedia, and of course WikiProject Medicine, can only survive if we continue to rope in new editors to fill in for us as we lose the time, interest, or ability to improve the encyclopedia. We all know that this work can be time-consuming and frustrating, but hopefully we can put aside our frustrations to help guide and recruit the talent that will ensure the project's continued success.

This may be a good time to remind yourself of the Wikipedia introduction pages, which have recently been improved. Help:Introduction provides a streamlined starting point, while Contributing to Wikipedia provides a more comprehensive reference guide. The Teahouse remains unnaturally quick at responding to questions, and is always a good place to direct new editors. The classic template has recently received a trimming, plus a few WikiProject Medicine-specific welcome templates are available at WikiProject_Medicine/Resources. When in doubt, you can always point an unsure user to WT:MED and we can all try to lend a hand. If you come across introductory resources that remain unclear, outdated, or conflicting please post at Wikipedia talk:Welcoming committee to bring it to the attention of interested editors.

Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the WikiProject Medicine mailing list. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.