Wikipedia:WikiProject Merseyside/Assessment

Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject Merseyside! This department focuses on assessing the quality and importance of Wikipedia's Merseyside-related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the WikiProject Merseyside project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Merseyside articles by quality and Category:Merseyside articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Frequently asked questions

 * How can I get my article rated? : Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
 * Who can assess articles? : Any member of WikiProject Merseyside is free to add or change the rating of an article.
 * Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? : Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
 * What if I don't agree with a rating? : You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
 * Aren't the ratings subjective? : Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department. Further information can also be found at the WikiProject Council's article assessment FAQ.

Instructions
An article's assessment is generated from parameters in the WikiProject Merseyside project banner on its talk page:

To assess the quality of an article, add one of the following values to the  parameter of the project banner. This will place the article in the appropriate subcategory of Category:Merseyside articles by quality.


 * adds the article to Category:FA-Class Merseyside articles
 * adds the article to Category:FL-Class Merseyside articles
 * adds the article to Category:A-Class Merseyside articles
 * adds the article to Category:GA-Class Merseyside articles
 * adds the article to Category:B-Class Merseyside articles
 * adds the article to Category:C-Class Merseyside articles
 * adds the article to Category:Start-Class Merseyside articles
 * adds the article to Category:Stub-Class Merseyside articles
 * adds the article to Category:List-Class Merseyside articles

Articles that have not yet been assessed for quality can be found at Category:Unassessed Merseyside articles.

To assess the importance of an article, add one of the following values to the  parameter of the project banner. This will place the article in the appropriate subcategory of Category:Merseyside articles by importance.


 * adds the article to Category:Top-importance Merseyside articles
 * adds the article to Category:High-importance Merseyside articles
 * adds the article to Category:Mid-importance Merseyside articles
 * adds the article to Category:Low-importance Merseyside articles

Articles that have not yet been assessed for importance can be found at Category:Unknown-importance Merseyside articles.

Requests for assessment
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new quality rating for it, please feel free to list it below. (Note that this is not required; any editor may assess or re-assess an article on their own, if acting in good faith.) If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please list it for peer review instead.

If you assess an article, please strike it off so that other editors will not waste time going there too. Comments are not mandatory and any should be left at the article's talk page; the list below will be wiped periodically.

Submit new requests here:
 * 1) Kirkby NeonRichards (talk) 12:06, 03 October 2020 (UTC)

Assessment log

 * The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.

Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Merseyside articles by quality log

Worklist

 * The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.