Wikipedia:WikiProject Mexico/Archives

Day of the Dead?
Is the Spanish-language translation "El Día de los Muertos" or "Día de Muertos"? Blank Verse  &empty; 09:06, 29 October 2005 (UTC)


 * you can omit the article "El", and leave it as "Día de Muertos".  Nanahuatzin 06:45, 31 October 2005 (UTC)


 * I asked my wife about this, and she agrees Dia de muertos is correct. However, she also noted that 1 November is Día de niños and 2 November is Día de difuntos (adult dead). I'd also note that in Spanish only the first letter of a sentence and proper nouns are capitalized. Tubezone 03:45, 2 November 2006 (UTC)


 * In my opinion both translations are good. The difference between them, is that "El Día de los Muertos" is more emphasised than "Día de Muertos". The use of the article "El" gives a especial importance to the day, because it defines the day as one in a kind. It gives the day a special meaning that there is only one day like it per year. However, it is acceptable to use both translations.
 * Alorenz 03:43, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

'''Borbotones Team!! Contribution'''



In addition to this we can say that both translations are correct, but as we are Mexican we can tell you that it is better to say: “Dia de muertos” or “El dia de muertos” omitting the article “los”, in this case this article is irrelevant and in common language it is not necessary.School and university projects/ITESM Campus Toluca/Borbotonesteam a common food for dia de los muertos is BURRITO BAKE! TEAM PAGE:School and university projects/ITESM Campus Toluca/Borbotonesteam

Park lovers we can say that both are correct.. and I'd like to add that November 1st is "Dia de todos los Santos" which means that all "Saints" are, somehow, remembered and they are supposed to celebrate that day. And November 2nd is "Dia de muertos" when some people ((Catholics)) go to the cementery and stay there all night. Arezvik 19:41, 25 September 2007 (UTC) Los Boogeys Contribution

We think that the translations are good and have the same meaning. When you say "El Día de muertos" is more formal and it will be a nice title for the article. Also "Día de muertos" is good, you use it for no formal. TEAM PAGE:School and university projects/ITESM Campus Toluca/Los Boogeys

Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team cooperation
Hello. I'm a member of the Version 1.0 Editorial Team, which is looking to identify quality articles in Wikipedia for future publication on CD or paper. We recently began assessing articles using these criteria, and we are are asking for your help. As you are most aware of the issues surrounding your focus area, we are wondering if you could provide us with a list of the articles that fall within the scope of your WikiProject, and that are either featured, A-class, B-class, or Good articles, with no POV or copyright problems. Do you have any recommendations? If you do, please post your suggestions at the listing of all active Places WikiProjects, and if you have any questions, ask me in the Work Via WikiProjects talk page or directly in my talk page. Thanks a lot! Tito xd (?!? - help us) 18:35, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

I would like to join
Hello, I've been a Wikipedian for most than a year, and I would like to join this project. I think that I could significantly contribute to expand it. User:Lufthmark

Mexican cuisine
1) the stub/category combination, Mexico-cuisine-stub /, is currently listed for deletion at Stub types for deletion. My personal opinion is that it shouldn't be too hard to fill up the stub category just by creating articles for all the redlinks in the list in the Mexican cuisine article.

2) For the Mexican cuisine article itself, it would be very helpful to add some annotations to the list of Traditional dishes, and maybe even divide the list into various subcategories. Blank Verse 08:45, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

One main mexican dish in our cuisine is called "Enchiladas". They are made of tortilla covered with "mole", that is a mixture of different kinds of chillis and chicken. They can be decorated with cream and cheese. Most of mexican dishes are really spicy. Mexicans can tolerate great amounts of chilli in every dish, but this doesn't mean that every dish must have chilli on it. If you would like any mexican candy, you should try crystallized fruits, that are dry fruits with sugar on them. Comment submitted by team User:ZYANYA06 []

Hi, we are Taco Team. We don’t agree with the deletion of Mexican cuisine stub. In fact, we would like to write about the typical Mexican food such as: “pambazos”, “tacos”, tortilla”, “enchiladas”, etc. We think this is an important topic because it truly represents Mexican culture. We have a great variety of dishes which are normally prepared with chili; many people can't stand the spicy flavor of mexican dishes, but once you get used to it, you can't stop eating it! As Mexicans, we can contribute with this kind of information, as it is related to our country and culture. Karencita88 02:05, 23 September 2007 (UTC)Karencita88 []

Mexican crime article nominated for deletion
User:Robert talan created an article on Mexican crime. That article has now been nominated for deletion. If that article is deleted, the content will probably be merged here. Please read the AfD and express your opinion.

--Richard 23:37, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

This article is no longer slated for deletion. It is getting some attention to make it into a serious article worthy of Wikipedia. Originally, the text was unsourced and tending towards a POV attack on Mexico. It is now a more objective treatment of the serious problem that Mexico has with crime.

--Richard 04:51, 22 May 2006 (UTC)


 * It's still got a serious POV problem, but mostly because of the difference between how crimes are reported in the USA vs. Mexico. For example, the bank robbery rate in Mexico is infintesimal compared to the USA, but there's few head to head statistical comparisons that I can find. The homicide rate in Mexico is going to include traffic accident deaths (all traffic deaths in Mexico are considered crimes) that don't get counted as actual violent homicides in the USA. AAMOF, the homicide rate reported in the USA is questionable because what qualifies as a homicide varies from state to state, for example, in some states a drunk-driving death is a negligent homicide, in others it may not be. Mexico follows the French model, thanks to Juarez, thus does not have the delineation between felonies and misdemeanors the English model contries like the USA has.
 * I did update the the crime statistics columns and added a column for comparable US statistics.Tubezone 04:07, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

We are Los boogeys team and we are Mexicans. We think the article Crime in Mexico need some attention because it needs a special part about REASONS FOR NOT DENOUNCE'''. We saw the article and we didn't find the reasons why people don't want to denounce. We say that because it is truth that the laws allow criminals to know all your personal information. Because of that, someone who denounces a criminal could be in a serious danger. Criminals can threat and even murder people who denounce them. We think that information would help to understand better, the context of this phenomenon. If you have doubts you can contact us in this link Los boogeys--IsaacFE 20:19, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Juarez needs work
Ciudad Juárez needs a lot of work. There's a decent enough history but almost nothing about the city today. --Dhartung | Talk 07:12, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Some sources to help Mexico_Japan
Ciudad Juarez is by definition a city of business because it has the mayor industrial infrastructure in Mexico. This city is visited every year by millions of people who are interested in making business with some of global and transnational enterprises. In addition to this Ciudad Juarez is visited by many tourists because of its great culture. We have found some useful links so that you can find relevant information about how is Ciudad Juarez nowadays. The only problem is that the pages are in Spanish, some of them are form the government so they are reliable sources. If you have any doubt please contact any of the Mexico-Japan group. Here they are : www.bestday.com.mx/Ciudad_Juarez www.chi.itesm.mx/chihuahua/turismo/juarez.html www.tripadvisor.es/Tourism-g150780-Ciudad_Juarez_Northern_Mexico-Vacations.html (This one has an option that says attractions) www.eluniversal.com.mx/graficos/publicidad_nueva/reportaje.htm www.portal-juarez.com/regional/dir/turismo.html www.juarez-mexico-esp.com/HTML/MoreInformation/TourismOffice/01-TourismOffice.htm Almeja 21:49, 20 September 2007 (UTC)] Mexico_Japan Group Page =) User:Thelmadatter

Human geography
Is Mexico part of North America, Central America, or what? And do we abide by the United Nations geoscheme, or conventional usage, or National Geographic?

Do the Spanish-speaking world and English-speaking world disagree over where to "place" this wonderful country? I tried to follow the dispute between Wikipedians over this matter, but it's scattered all over your web site. --Wing Nut 16:17, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

It's funny how people often fight for Mexico's "place in world". I am really sure of one thing: The two months I have spent here, had taught me a lot of this wonderful country. It has a great variety of pluricultural groups, food and very different weathers from zone to zone. Believe me, I am really familiarized with this fact. In Toluca for exmaple, people is known for being very kind and helpful. I have seen them working on the streets, selling stuff or just simply walking next to me. Their customs and culture can differ a lot, and what I personally like is that no one acts as an one inidividual person. They adopt the good part of others and become what Mexican people really is. So, I think Mexico is not just from one side or another, it is the combination of both. There's no place we can assign for it and at the end this really doesn't matter. The importance of this country is what they transmit to us, the foreigners, and I definetely agree we have a lot to learn about Mexicans. Crisp26 14:50, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

contributed by lovely girls team
 * In Mexico, as in most of Central American and South American countries, Spanish is the national language. Because of this, it is common for non-Latin countries to mistakenly associate Mexico with the other Latin countries. However, Mexico belongs geographically to North America, even if it is the only Latin country of this region, along with the United States of America and Canada. However, if you want to determine culturally where it belongs, it can be said, it's in a mid-point. Through out the years, Mexico has adapted to not only the USA culture, but it also preserves its Latin culture. Because of this, it can be said that Mexico is learning how to fuse together the best points from both cultures in order to improve as a country. Mary ann21 18:00, 21 September 2007 (UTC)Mary_ann21

The Pancakes Team It is difficult to locate Mexico in North America, Central America or South America not only for its greographical situation, but also for its mix of politic, cultural and linguistic variations. This aspect makes Mexico a very versatile country as it does not completely have a South American or North American orientation. But this indefinite location influences in the politic life of Mexico when it is almost obligated to take a decision about its help for Latin American countries or for United States. This situation has caused a lot of controversy because both sides (North and South) press Mexico and sometimes people say that it acts like a puppet of the interest of abroad nations. It could be said that some countries use this country as a mediatic element, as a judge of the conflicts between the countries. The reality is that Mexico maintains its neutral position in order to avoid problems and have a stable relationshp with North, Central and South America. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Karenpoket (talk • contribs) 23:12, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Mexico vs México
Now, is there a big reason for the México article redirecting to Mexico and not the other way? It's customary to name mexican cities, states, etc with the proper accented title, but the main article about the country is the opposite. Is there a good reason for that? Is there a problem if I switch them? -- Drini 00:29, 1 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Mexico (without the accent) is how the country is known in English, so that's the name used as per the MoS. Other less known towns/places may keep the original spelling of their name. -- Run e Welsh | &tau;&alpha;&lambda;&kappa; 14:21, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Project directory
Hello. The WikiProject Council has recently updated the WikiProject Council/Directory. This new directory includes a variety of categories and subcategories which will, with luck, potentially draw new members to the projects who are interested in those specific subjects. Please review the directory and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope that all the changes to the directory can be finished by the first of next month. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. B2T2 18:34, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Mexican American War
This article has lots of facts and background, but only for the American side. It needs more information on Mexican strategies, personalities, etc. I suggest peer reviewing it. Kevlar67 02:54, 2 November 2006 (UTC) Yes, PLEASE can I get some help with this... two articles that desperatly need some attention & quality upgrading are the Niños Héroes & the saint patrick's battalion. I also think that the latter should be in the scope of this wikiproject. I personailty have tried hard with these but have hit a dead end in terms of references and citations, someone who has a better understanding of mexican history & spanish would be very helpful I'm sure --Fennessy 18:57, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Mexican American War Contribution
Hi, I read your comment and I found some information. I hope you find it useful. Mexican-American War This war consisted in the secession of Mexican territories to the USA (Alta California and Santa Fé de Nuevo México) under the negotiations of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. Mexico lost about 1,300,000 km² which represented almost half of its territory. This war was very important for both countries, Mexico and USA, and point out the destiny of each country, this historical fact has intervened in many actual aspects of each in country like principally economy. We think the consequences of this war are still being seen principally in the economy aspect, because territory is a very important part for the economy of any country because of the commerce, production, natural resources, people etc. This can be seen with the comparison of economies of Mexico and USA besides other problems that also contribute to the bad economy of Mexico and the better economy of USA.Blueapple23 21:55, 23 September 2007 (UTC)Blueapple23

Question: The Nine Flowers of Christmas
A new user posted the article The Nine Flowers of Christmas. Google returns no matches for "Nine Flowers of Christmas" (including the quotation marks). Is this article true? Fg2 06:25, 22 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I have never heard about that. At least thats not a tradition in Jalisco, Tamaulipas or Nuevo Leon where I have lived.  I believe article isnt true.  Abögarp 00:28, 23 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I have never heard about that also. For example in my country, Ecuador, there is a tradition of the nine "posadas" before Christmas. I think maybe the flowers are related with this subject. Families often get together in one house, pray and eat the nine nights before. Personally, I love to attend to these "Christmas parties".

Crisp26 15:05, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Final (?) two missing articles for places in Mexico with populations > 100,000
The Missing articles for towns and cities with 100,000 or more inhabitants project has identified two places in Mexico which appear to have current populations of more than 100,000 and do not have articles in the English-language Wikipedia.

They are:
 * San Pablo de Las Salinas - see sv:San Pablo de Las Salinas
 * Soledad de Graciano Sánchez - see es:Soledad de Graciano Sánchez, sv:Soledad de Graciano Sánchez, pt:Soledad de Graciano Sánchez

Would anyone be interested in creating articles for these places? -- The Anome 11:15, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia Day Awards
Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 21:57, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

List of taco fillings
List of taco fillings has been nominated for deletion, along with List of burrito fillings. See Articles for deletion/List of taco fillings.  Blank Verse  09:21, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Mexico is a North American country vandal
I want to desperately ask for the community support in this issue. Ever since I joined Wikipedia this very specific user is trying to promote the false idea that Mexico is geopolitically part of Central America, or trying to give the idea that Mexico is considered part of Central America (geographically) most of the times. We all know that is not true.

It is impossible to me to stop his very biased edits. I know that some geographers consider the territory east of Isthmus of Tehuantepec physiographically part of Central America, but his biased edits and the words he uses are only to confuse the reader and give the "feeling" that Mexico is part of Central America.

First of all check the articles Mexico, Geography of Mexico, Central America and North America. Also Mesoamerica and Middle America. I know some of you can clean up the words he's using to give the bad impression that Mexico is part of CA.

Secondly, please check my evidence about his behaviour.

User Corticopia (his current user account) is the same person that used the accounts User:E Pluribus Anthony, User:Cogito ergo sumo, User:Ex post factoid, User:Lucky Mustard and User:A the 0th. His edits follow the same pattern: ignore the evidence provided to prove that in some parts of the world America is considered a single continent (and that North America = Canada, US and Mexico), ignoring that Central Americans do not consider Mexico part of this region, ignoring that in most educational systems Mexico is not included in Central America.

When he could not fight the overwhelming evidence proving him wrong (and after I won a case of suckpuppetry against him and ), he started editing the articles in order to say "Mexico is in southern North America", and lately to avoid saying "North America" at all and including the less used and very obscure term "Middle America". Please check the articles those accounts edit. The very same pattern.

Please check the evidence I provide to probe those users are Corticopia here. It is very important that you read the whole evidence.

However, if you chose to ignore the evidence I present (I do it so you can understand how long and how deep this problem is) please just help to clean up the articles. It is very frustrating that only me and other user are trying to avoid bias in Mexico-related articles. PLEASE HELP! Alex  Covarrubias  ( Let's talk! ) 06:10, 26 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Alex, I thought this issue was already settled down, especially after the poll, to which Corticopia and all participants fully agreed in Talk:Mexico. At least, on my part, I have already told you, if you believe your evidence is strong enough, then simply report him for sock puppetry yourself.
 * Now, per consensual agreement in Talk:Mexico (it might not be the case in other articles in which he is participating), the introductory paragraph will only state that Mexico is located in North America, whereas the Geography section will contain, all possible existing neutral geographical terms and definitions (ergo NPOV): geopolitical, geographical and physiographical, and that included "Middle America". This term, which I don't particularly like, is widely used in geography in the English speaking world, so it is not obscure. It is in fact used by CIA Factbook. It is rather in disuse, but nonetheless, existing. As such, it was included in the Geography section.
 * -- the D únadan  16:31, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I understand what you're saying. As I told you, I'm not accusing him of sockpuppetry since he's using just one account right now (that I know). I am presenting my evidence for the users to know he's a well known user, famous for using personal attacks, editing articles with particular bias and also by using sockpuppets. However, talking about "Middle America", it is very obvious that his edits and his wording are only to favour the wrong idea that Mexico is part of CA. Please check the recent edits in the articles Central America, Mesoamerica and Geography of Mexico where he's not commited to write in a very direct way that Mexico is not considered geopolitically part of CA. He reverts my edits. And about "Middle America", I am not saying it does not exist. It does. The important thing here is he's favouring the terms that are not widely used, just to give the impression that terms are the ultimate knowledge. And more importantly, why the article Mexico (geography section) have almost half a paragraph explaining what Central America is according to the different souces? That should be placed in the proper article, not in Mexico. Alex  Covarrubias  [[Image:Flag of Mexico.svg|15px]] ( Let's talk! ) 23:44, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The paragraph is not giving the definitions of Central America per se, but the definitions of Central America vis-à-vis Mexico, the country that happens to be the defining parameter of both regions (whether its the border, the isthmus or a transvolcanic belt). If Mexico's geographical, geological and physiogracial location is what gives North America and Central America their limits, it is quite obvious that these definitions should be included. Think of it the other way around, instead of saying "Central America starts at the isthmus..." you can say "North America ends at the isthmus..." same thing. Corticopia does not favor any term over any other term. After all the introduction only says "North America", whereas the Geography section elaborates on the limits of North America and Central America, and specifies a location in the geographical term "Middle America". I find it quite neutral to include all possible definitions and not just "favouring" one (North America). -- the D únadan  04:10, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
 * If the information should be presented in a very netural way, then the subarticle Geography should include the most extended usage, Mexico is in North America, then Mexico is partly in Central America and finally the alternate use of Mexico is in Middle America. Check the article North America, it already uses that logical order: the most extended version to the less used and finally the alternate version. It is not a matter of favoring "North America" over "Central America", just a logical order that the subsection do not follow. Insted of that, it first uses the concept of "Americas" by saying Mexico is in the middle latitudes of the Americas, then it says "southern North America". Corticopia always favored and even denied the conception of a single continent. Contradictory... Alex  Covarrubias  [[Image:Flag of Mexico.svg|15px]] ( Let's talk! ) 10:44, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
 * If it is just a matter of order, then I see no problem in changing it, as long as we include all. -- the D únadan  18:18, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

The subcontinent of North America is joined to the south east with Central America by Tehuantepec's isthmus. This is the narrowest part of Mexico and inside it are the states of Oaxaca, Chiapas, Tabasco and Veracruz. This is the point that initiates Central America. Nevertheless in spite of the fact that some states of Mexico can been consider in Central America. Mexico continue concerning to the subcontinent of North America together with Canada, US and Greenland (Denmark). In the other hand if we ask about Mexico in the UN, for them, Mexico is considered inside the division in the region of Central America. It seems that to determine this is they considered diverse factors, not only the geographical one.Christian Panchana 14:58, 21 September 2007 (UTC)Tim Nomber Juan

NORTHERN AMERICA is Geopolitically, according to the scheme of geographic regions and subregions used by the United Nations, Northern America consists of Canada, United States, Greenland, Saint-Pierre and Miquelon, Bermuda. NORTHERN AMERICA is not NORTH AMERICA......... please use your brain.

--Prodiynet (talk) 05:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Request for assistance with Valley of Oaxaca
Hey all - I recently created an article for the Valley of Oaxaca and am looking for help in expanding it. Unfortunately, I'm a Meso archaeologist by training, and am largely unfamiliar with a number of details concerning the valley. Specifically, the article needs a geography section and a dicussion on the more recent history - i.e., the later phase of Spanish rule through the modern era. Geographically speaking, information is needed on the geological formation of the valley and generaly geography - climate, hydrology (I can't seem to find it, but what are the names of the rivers that run through the valley?), land area, population statistics, etc. Any info/help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks in advance, -- Oaxaca dan 14:36, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi,

In "Valle de Oaxaca" the climate is 22°C. There are several typical dishes for example: tamales oaxaqueños, mole verde(chiken with sauce),mole rojo.The typical fruit is Chicozapote

There are 2 rivers that run through the valley ("Atoyac" and "Jalatlaco")

"Valle de Oaxaca" has an extension of 3.375 km2, of this 3.375 km2 there are only 1.200 km2 of cultivable land.The valley has a Y form, and it covers three basins ("cuencas"): "Etla" to the North, "Tlacolula" to the East and "Zaachila" to the South.

I hope this information helps you.. See ya

Nathaly07 21:00, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Bilateral relations discussion
I would like to invite you all to participate in a discussion at this thread regarding bilateral relations between two countries. All articles related to foreign relations between countries are now under the scope of WikiProject Foreign relations, a newly created project. We hope that the discussion will result in a more clean and organized way of explaining such relationships. Thank you. Ed  ¿Cómo estás? 18:53, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Latin cultures
Hello everyone! You may want to go to Latin cultures an participate in the article and discussion. There are a lot of disputed statements... The Ogre 12:37, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Cristero War FAR
Cristero War has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Sandy Georgia (Talk) 17:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Standard Infobox for the Municipalities of Mexico?
Is there a standard infobox for use on the specific pages of the various Municipalities of Mexico? I'm looking at the Cozumel article, and I think the infobox there could use some work. I was considering the islands infobox, but Cozumel is both an island and a municipio, and I'd drop information if I switched over to that infobox. - Fordan (talk) 00:57, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Layout
I think we should have a design like the WikiProject Brazil. Hugo Mosh 03:59, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I fully agree with you and I think we should have more involvement in this Proyect, it just seems to be here where people ocasionally add articles they have started or edited but no true guide as to what we are doing. Alixb 20:46, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Templates
I can't help but notice that you seem to have two banners? --Ptcamn 15:29, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Teacher Wanting to Have Students Contribute to Wikipedia as Project
Hi! I am an American English teacher teaching advanced college students in Toluca Mexico. I would like to set up a project for students where they can write articles in groups (and perhaps other tasks). I am reading the instructions and plan to write an article myself to understand the process. However, I would really appreciate if a member from this project could contact me and advise me. If my signature does not work, please contact me at osamadre@hotmail.com

Thelmadatter 14 June 2007

State infoboxes
Is there a good reason for why the infobox for each state is not based on a template? A template would make the article "code" more legible and would make any future changes in apperances easier. For an exemple of quickly put together alternative see User:Lokal Profil/testmall./Lokal_Profil 19:56, 4 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I dont think there is a good reason for that. Agree on using templates.  Im now adding the name of the 3 senators by state.. if you are working on creating a template pls consider that im currently adding the name of the senators (and its policial party) in the templates.  Abögarp 02:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * If you give me an example where this has been done I'll gladly incorporate this into the template./Lokal_Profil 03:29, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I've looked at how you've done Yucatán, as the template is now you can either enter it that style or the current style. To try around in a sandbox use for now and please tell me if ther is anything else thats needed or it anything looks wrong/counterintuitive. /Lokal_Profil 00:03, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Help with Calles Law stub and How do I join?
Hi, I need help with developing the stub for Calles Law into an article. I suspect that this may end up being a controversial one for a while. Also, how do I join this project? --Hugo Estrada 19:59, 5 July 2007 (UTC)"
 * Just add your name to the list and start contributing -- Alixb 20:46, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

COPITAS hey there ! we are copitas team... and we would love to help you with Calles law. Plutarco Elias Calles, mexican presindent by 1926, believed that church should be separated from the state. It is a controversial topic because it is seen as if he were against church. If you want you can contact us at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:School_and_university_projects/ITESM_Campus_Toluca/Copitas#Copitas_Team