Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Battle of Chonan


 * The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.  No further edits should be made to this discussion.


 * Promoted -MBK004 04:31, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Battle of Chonan

 * Nominator(s): — Ed! (talk)

I am nominating this article for A-Class review. — Ed! (talk) 01:11, 13 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments:
 * no dabs, alt text is present and ext links all work (no action required);
 * can you please try to reword the first sentence of the lead, currently it sounds like the third engagement on the night of July 7-8, when you mean third engagement of the war.
 * Fixed. — Ed! (talk)
 * per the MOS, I think "July 7-8" should be "July 7/8"
 * Fixed. — Ed! (talk) 01:32, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * in the Outbreak of the war section, "Far east" should be fully capitalised IMO as it is a proper noun;
 * Fixed. — Ed! (talk) 01:32, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * This sentence appears to be missing a word: "However, the division was under strength, only two-thirds the size of its regular wartime size". I'd suggest adding "and was" after "strength";
 * Fixed. — Ed! (talk) 01:32, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * some of the sentences are very short and stucatto, indeed it reads like a 2-3 round burst in places. An example is the last bit of the Outbreak of the war section. I'd suggest combining these two sentences;
 * Fixed. — Ed! (talk) 01:32, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * In the last part of the Early engagements section there is a full stop, but the next sentence begins without a capital letter;
 * Fixed. — Ed! (talk) 01:32, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * In the Opening moves section, Osan-Chonan road should have an endash per WP:DASH;
 * Fixed. — Ed! (talk) 01:32, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * In the North Korean attack section, the red link to "Howtizers" is a misspelling - it should be "howitzers" (that might fix up the red link);
 * Fixed. — Ed! (talk) 01:32, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * In the North Korean attack section, I suggest wikilinking "executive officer" and "companies";
 * Fixed. — Ed! (talk) 01:32, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * In the American withdrawal section, I think "...heavy casualties, and was saved..." should be reworded to "heavy casualties, but was saved...";
 * Fixed. — Ed! (talk) 01:32, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * In the American withdrawal section, I suggest wikilinking "mortar". — AustralianRupert (talk) 23:19, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Fixed. I think I have responded to all of your concerns. — Ed! (talk) 01:32, 21 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Support Question though: I was under the impression that 12:00pm was 0:00 hours, not 24:00. Was this not the case? TomStar81 (Talk) 21:31, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * That's my understanding, too, Tom, but not according to MOS, which indicates it can be both. That's not definately correct IMO, but who am I to argue with the MOS. — AustralianRupert (talk) 22:46, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I just changed it to "midnight" to avoid any confusion. — Ed! (talk) 01:32, 21 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Support all my concerns above have been addressed. Cheers. — AustralianRupert (talk) 08:45, 21 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Support I can see no reason why not to. Well done. --Jim Sweeney (talk) 09:26, 21 April 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.