Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Battle of Fort Donelson


 * The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.  No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Battle of Fort Donelson

 * Passed --Eurocopter (talk) 09:17, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Previous nomination

This is a resubmission of an article previously considered for A-Class. Prior nomination is archived here.

The criticisms of the article at that time have been corrected. I believe that it fully satisfies all criteria. My contribution has been limited to correcting one typo and editing out two discontinued templates, so I think I have no conflict of interest in promoting it. PKKloeppel (talk) 00:12, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Support, although again with comments - Other than that, it looks really good. Again, good job on the maps. JonCatalán(Talk) 16:07, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not a fan of the image gallery of generals and commanders under "opposing forces" - it leaves a huge white space. I changed the width to 100%, although you can change it back if you don't like it.  I would get rid of it altogether, but some might not agree with me.
 * I agree with Catalan. To me, the gallery just doesn't sit well with the rest of the article. Abraham, B.S. (talk) 01:33, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Like I said in the other review, I think the first instance of brigadier general should be spelled out and the abbreviation included in parenthesis.
 * I have the same suggestion for the citations.

Support (but tweaks, per above, needed for FAC). Very nice work. -- R OGER D AVIES  talk 08:05, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Support While I am again unhappy with the style of citation in this article (see my comments on the A-class review for Battle of Fort Henry), it still meets the criteria. Joe ( Talk ) 02:10, 4 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.