Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Carlson's patrol


 * The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.  No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Carlson's patrol
Respectfully submit this article about an operation during the Guadalcanal campaign for A-class review. I welcome your comments or suggestions. Cla68 (talk) 23:50, 16 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Support. Well done. Carom (talk) 01:54, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Support another outstanding article. I might be complaining about too much of a good thing, but the 'background' section seems over-long, and I'd suggest that this be trimmed back to the immediate background to Carson's patrol rather than the current potted history of the entire campaign - this material best belongs in the Guadalcanal campaign article. On the other hand, the background should provide a description of the Marine Raiders unique organisation and tactics as these seem to have been important during this battle. --Nick Dowling (talk) 03:13, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I've just added a para describing the battalion. I hope that it's OK. --Nick Dowling (talk) 04:02, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you for doing that and I'm going to try to cut down the background section. Cla68 (talk) 06:25, 17 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Support Looks good .TomStar81 (Talk) 23:36, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Good article.  Blnguyen  ( bananabucket ) 00:59, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Support. Kyriakos (talk) 07:48, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Support One of the better articles that I've read on a seemingly minor battle. I'd also like to commend the excellent usage of numerous maps throughout the article.  Cam (complaints) 23:58, 19 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.