Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/List of Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross recipients (M)


 * The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article promoted Hawkeye7 (talk) 05:16, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

List of Knight&

 * Nominator(s): MisterBee1966 (talk)

I am nominating this article for A-Class review because this work (should) includes all the most recent A-Class and Featured List Class recommendations made by fellow editors for a number of lists of Knight's Cross recipients. I therefore hope that this here list is at the same quality level. Thanks for your time. MisterBee1966 (talk) 06:20, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

 Comments Support. I contributed to the successful ACRs of two of the most recent of these lists (G) and (L), and to the successful FLN of (A) and all of my comments from those reviews are reflected in this article. Regards, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 02:03, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * no duplinks, no dablinks, checklinks ok, reflinks ok, earwig ok. No action needed.
 * the portraits in the RH column need alt text. Action needed.
 * done but I don't believe this to be an A-Class criteria. MisterBee1966 (talk) 07:55, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm not so sure it isn't (it requires images to have succinct captions, and if you follow the links you get to the WP:ALT page which states that for "images that link to their image description page, the alt text cannot be blank nor should the alt parameter be absent). Regardless of whether that is strictly true or not for A class, I thought it would help given you have started taking this series to FA. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 08:25, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * suggest you convert the ten digit ISBNs to 13 digit per WP:ISBN.
 * done MisterBee1966 (talk) 08:02, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Moving to support, well done on another list article of very high standard. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 08:25, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Support This excellent article easily meets the criteria - great work. Nick-D (talk) 10:50, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Support -- for the simple reason that I can't see any reason not to; the template is well and truly in place, and I don't see where this has deviated from it. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 04:17, 30 March 2013 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it.  No further edits should be made to this discussion.