Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/List of Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross recipients (N)


 * The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.  No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article promoted. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:33, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

List of Knight&

 * Nominator(s): MisterBee1966 (talk)

After four years of off and on work on this article I think it now peaked to what a fellow editors calls an "easy to do medal winners" article. The list should be ready for A-class evaluation now following the familiar layout and structure. I guess if he's right it should be a relative straightforward review. I welcome any constructive feedback. Thanks in advance. MisterBee1966 (talk) 05:28, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Support on prose per standard disclaimer. I would list my edits but ... none were needed, good work. Just a note: I think it helps a lot that you added "(RAD)" after Reichsarbeitsdienst, because it gives most readers an "out" ... that is, they don't have to try to make sense of the German if they don't want to, they can just remember it as RAD. English translations serve the same purpose, but sometimes acronyms are sufficient. - Dank (push to talk) 12:08, 14 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * 1 dab :
 * Hindenburg
 * External links check out (no action required)
 * done MisterBee1966 (talk) 16:44, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Citation error tool reveals two errors with reference consolidation:
 * Scherzer 2007, p. 161. (Multiple references contain the same content)
 * Scherzer p161 (Multiple references are using the same name)
 * done MisterBee1966 (talk) 16:44, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Images lack alt text, but its not an A Class requirement so its up to you if you want to add it (suggestion only)
 * Presentation of numbers seems inconsistent, although I imagine you may have a reason for this. For instance you write: "Of the 145 awards made..." then in other places: "Heer members received one-hundred-three of the medals" (why not "Heer members received 103 of the medals..." per WP:MOSNUM?
 * Likewise: "thirty-four to the Luftwaffe", which seems to me like it should be written as "34 to the Luftwaffe" for the same reason. Anotherclown (talk) 09:17, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
 * My reason was that this format had been requested in a review of another list. I am open minded here. MisterBee1966 (talk) 16:44, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Did the reviewer give a reason in that case? It seems incorrect to me (but I have been known to be wrong). Anotherclown (talk) 08:37, 4 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Support I find everything to be in order for the list, as with the others, and I don't think any comments or questions on my part are necessary. — Ed! (talk) 16:07, 4 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Support - article appears to be in order, up to MisterBee's usual excellent standard. Should be ready for FLC. Parsecboy (talk) 14:40, 5 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Support - The list was informative and complete, and the summary (lead) provided the necessary info. I see no reason for the article not to be promoted.   DCI talk 22:45, 12 October 2011 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.