Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/List of Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross recipients (U)


 * The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.  No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Closed with consensus to promote.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:49, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

List of Knight&

 * Nominator(s): MisterBee1966 (talk)

I am nominating this article for A-Class review because of the similarities to the List of Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross recipients (A) and (C), which are also currently under A-Class review. The layout and structure is derived from the Oak Leaves lists, the majority of which are featured lists. Thanks for the feedback! MisterBee1966 (talk) 08:14, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments. Please see my edits to List of Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross recipients (A). - Dank (push to talk) 04:27, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I applied your suggestions (where applicable) MisterBee1966 (talk) 13:21, 19 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Support on prose per standard disclaimer. - Dank (push to talk) 13:45, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Support:
 * the Earwig tool reports no copyright violations: (no action required);
 * there are no dab links, ext links work, alt text is present (no action required);
 * the images appear appropriately licenced (no action required);
 * there is a slight inconsistency in your Notes section. Some end with full stops, while some don't. For instance compare Note # 1 with # 2. They should be consistent and my suggestion is to use full stops for all. AustralianRupert (talk) 12:11, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for spotting this. done MisterBee1966 (talk) 12:20, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Support from me, meets the A-Class criteria and is consistent with the other articles of the series. Woody (talk) 11:42, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Support - as in the previous review the only issue I can see is the overlinking in the list itself of the service of each recipient (e.g. Heer, Kriegsmarine and Luftwaffe etc) and their ranks (e.g. Oberst etc.). Probably should only link each one once in the list per WP:REPEATLINK. Anotherclown (talk) 22:59, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I disagree with the link only once issue. Standard form at FLs is that multiple links are ok as the "link on first instance" rule does not and cannot apply to sortable tables. It's certainly something I've adhered to in the lists I've helped develop. Woody (talk) 23:03, 9 July 2011 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.