Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/List of Knight's Cross with Oak Leaves, Swords or Diamonds recipients of the Waffen-SS


 * The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.  No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Promoted. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:38, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

List of Knight&

 * Nominator(s): MisterBee1966 (talk)

I am nominating this article list for A-Class review because it is well researched and cited and I feel it meets the A-Class criteria. MisterBee1966 (talk) 13:07, 1 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment: It's a list. Can you provide more background about what this award meant for German soldiers and when this award was displayed? Wandalstouring (talk) 17:12, 1 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Wouldn't this be something to address in the article about the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross itself? MisterBee1966 (talk) 10:35, 2 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Support
 * I wish that some of the notes could be combined. For example, 3, 4, and 6 seem to be almost exact duplicates except for the names and numbers, and the same with 11, 12, and 13.
 * It's not "the XX Month, year", either the the should be removed "he was killed 24 March, 1945", or the ordinal number should be used "the 24th of March." I noticed this several times in footnotes about disputed dates of death.
 * I think I fixed all occurances MisterBee1966 (talk) 13:49, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Looks good, just these issues. – Joe   N  14:57, 8 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Support – an excellent list as usual, that I cannot fault. Well done! Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 02:07, 10 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Support I'm not usually a list visitor, but this is very well done. One questions, should it not read "...Knight's Cross with Oak Leaves, Swords or Swords and Diamonds"? Perhaps a better title would be "List of Waffen-SS recipients of the ..."? A one line description of the Waffen-SS in the introduction may also be helpful. Good job. Dhatfield (talk) 16:39, 29 November 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.