Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/List of breastwork monitors of the Royal Navy


 * The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.  No further edits should be made to this discussion.


 * Promoted -MBK004 06:45, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

List of breastwork monitors of the Royal Navy

 * Nominator(s): Sturmvogel 66 (talk)

I am nominating this article for A-Class review because it's bound for FLC. As usual I'm concerned about the amount of information provided, whether too much or not enough. I'm not sure if HMVS Cerberus should included because I'm not sure of the exact legal relations ships between the Colony of Victoria's navy and the Royal Navy. Thoughts on this issue from Australian editors are welcome. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 05:27, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Heritage Division (2010). p21 can be individually linked to in the reference section using ...: p. 21. This cleans up the "Individual page can be found here..." issue?  All cites and refs look good.  Fifelfoo (talk) 05:47, 21 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Indeed it can.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:33, 28 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Support: Can see nothing that concerns me --Jim Sweeney (talk) 17:16, 24 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Support per usual disclaimer. I would appreciate it if someone would check my copyediting. - Dank (push to talk) 13:24, 29 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments : (technical)
 * two dab links reported: ;
 * Fixed
 * ext links work (no action required);
 * images lack alt text, you might consider adding it (suggestion only);
 * I think File:Cyclops class monitor diagrams Brasseys 1888.jpg needs the PD-1923 tag rather than the life of author + 70 years (the author's name isn't stated, so there is nothing to support this claim);
 * Done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:37, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * other images seem correctly licenced to me. AustralianRupert (talk) 14:36, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Support: my concerns have been addressed and the article has been thoroughly copyedited. AustralianRupert (talk) 23:58, 2 October 2010 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.