Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Operation Igloo White/Archive 1

Operation Igloo White
For your perusal. RM Gillespie 16:36, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I would like to see a few more citations to cover a couple places that are pretty bare. Specifically, the first paragraph of "Pinball Wizards" and the first two paragraphs of "Conclusion." Other than that, it looks good. Carom 17:06, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose In general well-written and well-cited, good flow. However:
 * 1) Needs a proofread. There are missing quotation marks, many broken citations that appear as question marks in the references section.
 * 2) Every book-scanned image is completely crooked. Look at the margins of the images compared to the margins of the surrounding boxes.
 * 3) Lacks depth. I was expecting a much more technical article with descriptions of the sensors, this is a nice overview but it left me wanting for more info. - Emt147  Burninate!  08:21, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose there are to many question marks in the reference section. When these question cites are replaed with cites that have meaningful information I will reconsider. TomStar81 (Talk) 19:59, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose - I'm gonna have to go with oppose also for alot of the reasons that Emt147 listed, specifically the depth of the article and the images included in the article. It is a well organized and well written article, however it lacks detail and depth. The image issue is secondary, but better images would only enhance the article as a whole. Spot87 02:08, 8 January 2007 (UTC)