Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Robert Bacher


 * The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


 * Promoted. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  12:25, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Robert Bacher

 * Nominator(s): Hawkeye7 (talk)

Next in the long line of Manhattan Project articles. Unless someone else comes to the party, this will take years. Hawkeye7 (talk) 08:20, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Support: I did some minor copy editing, please check you are happy with my changes. Overall, I believe that this article meets A-class standards. I have a couple of minor comments about the images:
 * "File:Robert F. Bacher.GIF": the image description page currently says "Date: 22 March 2013, 21:42:17", but shouldn't it be the date that the image was taken?
 * "File:Bacher, Lilienthal, Pike, Waymack and Strauss.jpg" as above, this says "Date: 26 March 2013, 07:21:06", but shouldn't it be the date the image was taken?
 * "File:Jean Dow Bacher Los Alamos ID.png", probably needs a date of creation if you have one;
 * "File:Robert Bacher ID badge.png" as above. AustralianRupert (talk) 00:18, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * All points addressed. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:18, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

 Comments Support by Peacemaker67 (send... over) 02:46, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * a couple of images need alt text
 * all other toolbox checks are green (dab, ext links, reflinks, redirects, earwig, and no overlinking) (no action required)
 * suggest "and his wife Jean" in the lead
 * what does "visitor" mean with respect to Edward Condon?
 * suggest you actually mention Teller by name instead of just a reference to the "Super" bomb
 * "200 inches" doesn't really work, it should be 200 inch IMO
 * suggest "his wife Jean had having died"
 * All points addressed. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:18, 4 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment Support
 * Technical review has been done above (no action req'd).
 * This doesn't quite sound correctly worded to me: "...on the Zeeman effect of hyperfine structure of atomic levels...". Not really sure what may / may not be wrong with it though (not understanding the physics aspects of the article I'm not sure of the correct terminology). Is it missing a plural somewhere? It just seems awkward to me (also repeated in body of the text). Would this work better: "...the Zeeman effect on the hyperfine structure of atomic levels..."?
 * Yes, there was a missing word. Added. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:59, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Missing word here: "...Bacher moved back to Ann Arbor, where lived at home..."
 * Another missing word. Added. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:59, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Otherwise fine. Anotherclown (talk) 22:41, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * All points addressed. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:59, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Added my support now. Anotherclown (talk) 01:32, 17 May 2013 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it.  No further edits should be made to this discussion.