Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/Heuschrecke 10

Heuschrecke 10

 * Previous peer review

It is currently on a real peer review, but I have gotten no good answers and it has changed a lot, see this diff which shows the difference from the old peer review to this one. Dreamy  §   01:16, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Megapixie

 * A promising start. Suggestions:
 * The lead is a little confused - i.e. there are single sentences like "The manufacturers were based in Magdeburg.", which spoil the flow of prose a little. Try and break it into maybe three paragraphs, which each paragraph about a specific area.
 * When I write these articles I try and split it clearly into a Lead, Development, Description, Operational history, Variants. The description should include a front to back description of the vehicle. Example: "The tank has a welded steel hull varying in thickness between 10 and 25 millimeters. The driver sits at the front left of the hull, with the engine to his right. The engine is a The driving controls are lever based, with four forward gears and two reverse gears connected to the Acme hydrotransmission system by a series of rods. Behind the driver, in the center of the turret is the two man turret..." This is important, as the article should be able to stand alone to a certain extent.
 * Megapixie (talk) 04:41, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Megapixie (talk) 04:41, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Megapixie (talk) 04:41, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

GraemeLeggett

 * MoS stuff for a start. I've fixed some of it.
 * Could you please explain what must be done?


 * Introductory paragraphs are confusing - the intro should be a clear overview of it.


 * The relationship between the two designs is confusing. Were there 2 designs of which one was selected and one not, or were both selected?
 * ✅ See the Cancellation section.


 * The comparison of the two is over-complex - especially since they both have the same crew and engine and other details. The specification comparison should be summarised for those who can't follow the spec table.
 * How would I do that? And if you notice there are differences.


 * Where does the 165/1 fit in - another design, a derivative?
 * Yes... It doesn't need to be there, it is just another weapon-carrier that came before the Heuschrecke. I'll remove it.✅

GraemeLeggett (talk) 13:07, 29 January 2008 (UTC)