Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/List of Knight's Cross recipients of the Waffen-SS

List of Knight's Cross recipients of the Waffen-SS

 * Previous review

I am asking for a second review of the list. I now consider the article close to ready and thanks to Jim Sweeney the article may soon qualify for A-class and maybe even for FAC. My concern is the footnotes section which is quite lengthy. Please let me know where the article can be improved. I also would like to know how the alt= parameter of the images is to be handled. I assume this is required for every image but I see limited value when every image describes more or less the same thing. Thanks MisterBee1966 (talk) 08:16, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Auntieruth55

 * wouldn't those pictures be more manageable in gallery format after the charts, or, even better, inserted into the chart, such as is done here?  Auntieruth55 (talk) 15:57, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I second Auntieruth's comment about a gallery after the appropriate table. That will reduce the amount of empty space. (Guyinblack25 talk 18:18, 30 September 2009 (UTC))
 * done MisterBee1966 (talk) 21:50, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * looks much better. It's still cumbersome, but at least manageable. Auntieruth55 (talk) 00:34, 1 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Are you translating schwer verwundet=heavily wounded? If so, you have the proper grammar (heavily is constructed correctly, as is wounded), but the wrong adverb.  We would say badly wounded (or seriously wounded), and I think (not certain) this is universal throughout the US/Commonwealth/Britain etc.  Other various: tödlich verwundet=fatally wounded, gefährlich verletzt = seriously wounded or badly wounded.
 * severe is the better choice, thanks MisterBee1966 (talk) 09:26, 1 October 2009 (UTC)


 * another question: several of these men show up on more than one chart (i.e., Sepp Dietrich). Is it worth pulling the multiple lists out?  Or is it possible to alphabetize the whole sheebang?


 * I realize it's been a HUGE job, and cudos for doing it. Just pondering manageability. Auntieruth55 (talk) 00:34, 1 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Some men show up in multiple sub-lists because of the nature of the Knight's Cross. The KC had 5 different grades, and recipients could receive a higher grade if they continued to distinguish themselves in combat. I tried explaining this in the lead section. I therefore feel that a list of Waffen-SS KC recipients should point this out. However I do see the point that this article has become somewhat of a monster. MisterBee1966 (talk) 09:49, 1 October 2009 (UTC)