Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/Operation Ten-Go

Operation Ten-Go
I believe this article is ready for review. I used the old system of reference citations, because, to be honest, I still can't figure out how to use the newer, recommended Wikipedia footnote system (does anyone have an example article I can use as reference?). Anyway, after peer review and making any suggested changes, I hope to nominate the article for at least "good article" status. Thank you in advance for your suggestions and comments. Cla68 16:52, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Kirill Lokshin
Excellent article. I would go ahead and convert the inline citations to footnotes; see here for an example using the new cite.php method of creating them. In addition, expanding the lead section to at least two paragraphs might be appropriate here. Other than that, I see no problems with the article. Great work! Kirill Lok s h in 01:35, 25 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the example. I changed the citations to footnotes and expanded the lead section as requested.  If no objection, I'll go ahead and archive this peer review and nominate the article for "good article" status.  However, before I think about nominating it for "featured article" (FA) status I assume that I need to add a few more references, add the page numbers to each reference, and add at least one map showing exactly where the battle actually occurred and the position of the two forces in relation to each other because most of the battle FAs that I see contain those items.  Thanks again for the assistance. Cla68 13:29, 25 April 2006 (UTC)


 * A proper military map would be nice, of course—particularly one with ship positions indicated. It's nothing to be terribly concerned about, though; if all else fails, just a map of the general area would probably suffice. Kirill Lok s  h in 21:22, 25 April 2006 (UTC)