Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/Roza Shanina

Roza Shanina
The article underwent a considerable expansion, most recently from requested scanned sources, and currently I'm looking forward for a higher class assessment. Any grammatical/MOS fixes or rearrangements are appreciated. Twilight chill t   21:24, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Fifelfoo
Generally here the sourcing is terrible. Both in that sources with no reliability claim have been used, and, that the handling of bilingual citations makes it difficult to confirm the quality of publications. In particular, the failure to identify containing works for cited objects that are elements of larger works is problematic. In the case of Yevgeny Ovsyankin 2004, the book wasn't identified as a book!


 * ""The Sniper Log Book". Sniper Central. http://www.snipercentral.com/snipers.htm#WWII. Retrieved 2008-10-21." has an author "Mel". And it isn't reliable, is is SPS, unedited, and no sign of expertise.
 * "Алёшина, А., Попышева, К. Снайпер Роза. Краеведческий альманах "Отечество", №8, Калининград, 2010, сс. 14, 15, 16" is out of style. I think you mean Алёшина, А., Попышева, К. (2010). "Снайпер Роза." [Sniper Rosa]. Краеведческий альманах "Отечество" [Local Lore anthology "homeland"], 8, Калининград, pp. 14–16.?  What makes this reliable?
 * Brayley, Martin; Ramiro Bujeiro (2001).  Osprey has a location
 * ""Sniper Roza Shanina" (in Russian). Armoury Online. http://www.armoury-online.ru/links/useful_files/shanina/. Retrieved 2010-12-27." is actually "Снайпер Роза Шанина." [Sniper Roza Shanina]. etc... Translate indicates this is a primary source.  You are reliant on a primary source.  This constitutes Original Research.
 * ""USSR in the Epoch of "Big Leap"" (in Russian). Sarist.narod.ru. http://sarist.narod.ru/dop25.htm. Retrieved 2010-12-30." is "СССР В ЭПОХУ «БОЛЬШОГО СКАЧКА», КОНЕЦ 1920-Х—1941 гг" [The Soviet Union during the "Great Leap", 1920–1941.] История России [History of Russia.] and there's nothing indicating it is reliable.
 * Yevgeny Ovsyankin (2004). "Sniper Roza Shanina" (in Russian). Arkhangelsk Pedagogical College. Arkhangelsk: ZAO "Arkhconsult". http://www.pomorsu.ru/avpu/history/08.htm. Retrieved 2008-10-21. is Yevgeny Ovsyankin (2004). "Снайпер Роза Шанина" [Sniper Roza Shanina]. In Архангельский педагогический колледж [Arkhangelsk Pedagogical College.] 2nd ed. (in Russian). Arkhangelsk: Совета Архангельского педагогического колледжа. http://www.pomorsu.ru/avpu/history/08.htm. Retrieved 2008-10-21.
 * Also a chapter from Ovsyankin (2004) Архангельский педагогический колледж: "In the years of the Great Patriotic War..." (in Russian). Arkhangelsk Pedagogical College. http://avpu.pomorsu.ru/history/07.htm. Retrieved 2010-12-30.
 * Primary source: "The Front Diary of I. E. Kukuyev"
 * Improve this citation with the actual Russian titles separated from any attempt to translate or transliterate "Pyotr Molchanov (1976). "A Thirst for Battle" (in Russian). Снайперы (compilation). Moscow: OAO "Molodaya gvardiya". http://www.a-z.ru/women_cd2/12/4/i80_207.htm. Retrieved 2008-10-21."
 * Include search method and terms to get the result required, where's the reliability claim? "Database search results" (in Russian). Book of Memory of Arkhangelsk Oblast. http://www.ipc.antat.ru/Ref/fields.asp?f=%D8%E0%ED%E8%ED%E0&s=%D0%EE%E7%E0&l=&y=&m=&r=&b=&np=true&p=1&ID={E2E5335A-A0A0-499A-8354-6EFFAAF8E26A}. Retrieved 2010-12-30.
 * Lidiya Bazhenova. "Snipers" (in Russian). A-z.ru. http://www.a-z.ru/women_cd2/12/6/i80_9.htm. Retrieved 2010-12-30. is a probable copyvio, it is a chapter from the book ЖЕНЩИНЫ РОССИИ — КАВАЛЕРЫ ОРДЕНА СЛАВЫ, which appears to be a collection of primary sources. "Here - and unsophisticated recollections of former nurses, svyazistok, spies, snipers, radio operators, engineers, pilots, drivers and stories about military girlfriends, recreating the image of women in war. Here - and poignant in its original sincerity of sketches, highlighting the different angles a diverse and tragic image of war itself." [trans. of "Здесь — и бесхитростные воспоминания бывших сестер милосердия, связисток, разведчиц, снайперов, радистов, саперов, летчиц, шоферов и рассказы о боевых подругах, воссоздающие образ женщины на войне. Здесь — и пронзительные в своей первозданной искренности зарисовки, высвечивающие под разными углами зрения многоликий и трагический образ самой войны."] from "К ЧИТАТЕЛЮ" [To the reader] In ЖЕНЩИНЫ РОССИИ — КАВАЛЕРЫ ОРДЕНА СЛАВЫ [WOMEN OF RUSSIA - Knight of the Order of Glory] "Publication i3_1800_12_6" index.


 * There is a solution to the problem of the original research you've conducted into this sniper biography. You write up a limited biography of the sniper and get it published as a research note in a local history journal or other Reliable Source; and then cite that.  Fifelfoo (talk) 00:37, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I've performed the suggestions. Yet WP:PRIMARY allows the usage of primary sources "to make straightforward, descriptive statements that any educated person, with access to the source but without specialist knowledge, will be able to verify", in this case Shanina's diary. The same actually goes for Kukuyev, there is no interpretation, but a plain example of another military diary. As for database search results, they are located on the website of the Book of Memory of Arkhangelsk Oblast, which is quite sufficient for reliability. Lastly, I believe that the almanac "Homeland" is reliable because it is a Russian local lore issue and the article was supervised by historian. Naturally there are more Russian sources on Shanina rather than the English ones, but all of them are verifiable (I have scans of the offline references). Twilight chill  t   02:16, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for replying. History, including military history, requires that the interpretation of primary sources, including diaries, be conducted by experts (ie: historians, or, people who publish under the supervision of historians).  As such there is no straight forward way to interpret a diary without the results of that interpretation being "Original Research" for wikipedia purposes.  You're absolutely correct about "Homeland" being a reliable source, local history associations often produce reliable material.  Thanks again. Fifelfoo (talk) 00:14, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Buckshot06
I'd endorse Fifelfoo's comments; we need to avoid doing original research. Please contact me for help if you need assistance finding such a journal to place the article in. Buckshot06 (talk) 01:15, 12 January 2011 (UTC)