Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/ProgressNRHPlistsByState

Sevitcejbo and discussion
(open for discussion)
 * to table-ize all
 * in table-izing process, identify disambiguation page fixes needed (either to create a disambig page or to refine an existing dab page)
 * do all those disambiguation cleanups: bring Category:NRHP dab needing cleanup to zero.  On June 1 there were 66 and currently there are ' articles in Category:NRHP dab needing cleanup.  (On June 1 there were 1103 and currently there are ' articles in Category:Disambig-Class National Register of Historic Places articles overall.)
 * get peer review for one or two NRHP lists?
 * Lvklock Kcolkvl has now requested peer review for List of RHPs in Syracuse
 * Enod ✅ Peer review completed for Syracuse. Also List of NHLs in IN went thru FA review.


 * get a bot run to add NRHP project banners to all list-articles and to many indiv NRHP pages that lack them. Perhaps have bot drop hidden Category:Lists of coordinates per my note at Category talk:Lists of coordinates.
 * Drafting a bot request at WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Botrequest2. doncram (talk) 03:20, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Bot request developed part way, taking time as all sub-categories have to be listed individually and ones that may have non-NRHPs need to be separated out. doncram (talk)
 * Got feedback on format of bot request, at Bot requests/Archive 28. --Doncram
 * Bot being run, by Anomie. :)  It added 700+ to bring the NRHP list-article category over 2,000, has added many other articles to the project, and may still be running... :)

I currently think doing all the above is feasible. doncram (talk) 00:02, 1 June 2009 (UTC) marcnod


 * A bunch of progress was made, but the AR list is taking forever, and disambiguation just grows, and MO and NC loom large.... doncram (talk) 17:10, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, we can only do what we can do. We'll keep plugging away. I'm with you on AR.  Who knew there was so much there! I'm up for trying to finish AR this weekend, or by Monday, which I happen to have off. Lvklock (talk) 17:19, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * AR mostly done. Some states like this are far more difficult than others, in part probably because of state staff choices in NRHP place names (their choosing to use common names).
 * Yay, AR and MO seem done!
 * Although several hundred new dab pages have been developed, and/or many existing dab pages cleaned up, there still remain a significant number of NRHP dab cleanups to do. I'll plug away, don't promise to finish this part, but will try.  It would be nice to clear the category! doncram (talk) 04:20, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Crunch-time! All or almost all counties outside NC done, i believe.  About the many counties in NC to be done, i notice discussion on order to proceed at User talk:Sanfranman59 and User talk:Lvklock.  I am supposing that others' help would be welcome, but am myself bogged down in dab pages and other.  Hopefully others than me can help in NC? doncram (talk) 15:59, 2 July 2009 (UTC)


 * One county in South Carolins left. It has a ? mark in the tally column on the main List of RHPs in SC page.  Other than that, Sanfranman is working largets to smallest in NC. and I will work smallest to largest.  If anyone else wants to help, just note here what you want to do on the small end, and I'll work around.  Still seems doable, I think. Lvklock (talk) 17:31, 2 July 2009 (UTC)