Wikipedia:WikiProject New Brunswick/Assessment

Welcome to the assessment department of the WikiProject New Brunswick! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's New Brunswick articles.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the NewBrunswickProject project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:New Brunswick articles by quality, Category:New Brunswick articles by importance, Category:New Brunswick articles needing attention.

Frequently asked questions

 * [[Image:RomanQ-01.png|12px]] : How can I get my article rated? :[[Image:RomanA-01.png|12px]] : As a member of the WikiProject New Brunswick, you can do it yourself. If you are unsure, list it in the requesting an assessment section below.


 * [[Image:RomanQ-01.png|12px]] : Who can assess articles? :[[Image:RomanA-01.png|12px]] : Any member of WikiProject New Brunswick is free to add or change the rating of an article, but please follow the guidelines.


 * [[Image:RomanQ-01.png|12px]] : Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? :[[Image:RomanA-01.png|12px]] : Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that (might) need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.


 * [[Image:RomanQ-01.png|12px]] : Where can I get more comments about my article? :[[Image:RomanA-01.png|12px]] : You could list it for a Peer review.


 * [[Image:RomanQ-01.png|12px]] : What if I don't agree with a rating? :[[Image:RomanA-01.png|12px]] : Let us know on the project talk page.


 * [[Image:RomanQ-01.png|12px]] : Aren't the ratings subjective? :[[Image:RomanA-01.png|12px]] : Yes, they are (see, in particular, the disclaimers on the importance scale), but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page.

Instructions
An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the NewBrunswickProject project banner on its talk page. You can learn the syntax by looking at the talk pages in edit mode and by reading the info below.

This is the rating syntax (ratings and dates are samples, change to what applies to the article in question): The following values may be used for the class parameter:
 * displays the default banner, showing the project info and only ??? for the quality and importance parameters.
 * all assessed articles should have quality and importance filled in. Leaving the other parameters off does not hurt anything.
 * if an article needs immediate attention, add the attention tag and please leave talk notes as to why. "yes" is the only valid parameter here. If it doesn't need attention, leave the parameter off.
 * all assessed articles should have quality and importance filled in. Leaving the other parameters off does not hurt anything.
 * if an article needs immediate attention, add the attention tag and please leave talk notes as to why. "yes" is the only valid parameter here. If it doesn't need attention, leave the parameter off.
 * if an article needs immediate attention, add the attention tag and please leave talk notes as to why. "yes" is the only valid parameter here. If it doesn't need attention, leave the parameter off.


 * FA (adds articles to Category:FA-Class New Brunswick articles)
 * A (adds articles to Category:A-Class New Brunswick articles)
 * GA (adds articles to Category:GA-Class New Brunswick articles)
 * B (adds articles to Category:B-Class New Brunswick articles)
 * Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class New Brunswick articles)
 * Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class New Brunswick articles)
 * NA (for pages, such as templates or disambiguation pages, where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:Non-article New Brunswick pages). This means "non-article", NOT non-applicable.


 * List (for lists, adds articles to Category:List-Class New Brunswick articles)
 * Image (for images and animations, adds articles to Category:Image-Class New Brunswick articles)
 * Category (for cateories, adds articles to Category:Non-article New Brunswick pages)
 * Template (for templates, adds articles to Category:Template-Class New Brunswick articles)
 * Disambig (for disambiguation pages, adds articles to Category:Disambig-Class New Brunswick articles)
 * Needed (for non-existent articles that need to be created, adds articles to Category:Needed-Class New Brunswick articles)
 * Portal (do not use for now, as there is no New Brunswick Portal yet, adds articles to Category:Portal-Class New Brunswick articles, though)

Articles for which a valid class and/or importance is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed New Brunswick articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

The following values may be used for the importance parameter:


 * Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance New Brunswick articles)
 * High (adds articles to Category:High-importance New Brunswick articles)
 * Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance New Brunswick articles)
 * Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance New Brunswick articles)
 * Bottom (adds articles to Category:Bottom-importance New Brunswick articles)
 * No (adds articles to Category:Unknown-importance New Brunswick articles)

The parameter is not used if an article's class is set to NA, and may be omitted in those cases. The importance should be assigned according to the importance scale below.

Quality scale
Note: A B-class article should have at least one reference.

Importance scale
The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to residents of New Brunswick. Importance does not equate to quality; a featured article could rate 'mid' on importance.

Requesting an assessment or re-assessment
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.
 * 1) Add articles here! Newest requests on the BOTTOM
 * 2) Like this and put "(re-)assessment request" in your edit summary of this assessment page, leave reasons if a reassessment.