Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography/Assessment

Assessment
The template to use is WikiProject Pornography on the article talk page, specifically

That's the basic procedure. Additional hints:
 * The importance rating can be different for every project, but the quality (-Class) rating should be the same for all of them.
 * If the article talk page already uses Pornstars, delete that and replace it with WikiProject Pornography, because even though they have the same effect, that makes the MetaData tool work better.

See Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment and WikiProject_Biography/Assessment for more general information about assessment; this page covers the details specific to our project.

Requesting an assessment
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use the peer review department instead. Please archive requests that are complete.

Please place new requests (in the format, # article name -- ~ ) at the bottom of the list:


 * 1) Jack Radcliffe - Luminum (talk) 17:02, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality scale
See Category:Pornography articles by quality.

Note that we can't give out GA or FA quality tags, there are separate Wikipedia processes for that. Also, be very sparing giving out A-Class tags; in other words, basically don't do it. So this means that there are only 4 quality tags that can be put on all but the most exceptional articles: Stub, Start, C or B-Class.

Note that given the nature of this specific project, most of the interesting content in our articles is going to be at least somewhat controversial. That means that for a high quality article we need more inline citations than an article from another WikiProject on, say, European architecture, or Medieval history.

Importance scale
Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Assessment and WikiProject_Biography/Assessment both go into great detail on Quality but relatively little on Importance. However, we can look at other well organized projects to get an idea. We can try to maintain similar ratios. Our current articles are mostly porn stars, from the recent time that this was Wikiproject:Porn Stars, so there are many other articles on glamour models, porn films, magazines, books about pornography, studios or other related topics that could be added.
 * WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Assessment has Top:High:Mid:Low ratios of 15:70:390:434
 * WikiProject India/Assessment has Top:High:Mid:Low ratios of 160:351:639:837

As above, being extremely careful to essentially not add articles to Top-importance, leaves three importance categories. Please note that an individual's fame for achievements outside pornography is irrelevant to our importance rating. We only consider their importance within porn. For example, if a porn star has also appeared in mainstream films, this does not boost their importance rating.

Statistics
See Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Pornography articles by quality statistics