Wikipedia:WikiProject Psychology/Assessment

This is the WikiProject Psychology article assessment page. Our assessments are based on the Version 1.0 Editorial Team, as part of their Work via WikiProjects initiative.

Importance
It is also possible to use imp for this purpose.

Importance scale
The article's importance, regardless of its quality

Hall of heroes
This is a space, created October 2021, to commemorate significant efforts in assessment.
 * Bibeyjj: added 6 October 2021, for getting quality assessments to 100% and maintaining it there. --Xurizuri (talk) 02:41, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Requesting an assessment or re-assessment
What you can accomplish here
 * This process is to find out whether your article is currently assessed at the correct quality level (Stub, Start, C, B) and correct importance (Low, Mid, High, Top). If you have significantly expanded an article and it is rated below B class, or if you feel the rating is otherwise incorrect, then please feel free to list it below.

What you can NOT accomplish here 'Add articles here! Newest requests on the BOTTOM, and remember to sign using ~ '
 * If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, contact the volunteers at WT:PSYCH or list it at Peer review instead.
 * If you think the article is particularly well written, then you can nominate it as a possible Good article or even as a possible Featured article.

List

 * Quality reassessment of Psychiatric pharmacy (see original request).
 * Quality reassessment of Christian counseling. It hasn't been re-assessed since 2006. It's not a stub, but I'm not sure aside from that.
 * Quality reassessment of Gerard Heymans: I expanded this article and added references. I think it is no longer a stub article. REGIW (talk) 10:56, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Complete assessment of Leopoldo Salazar Viniegra: Created in April. Bflx 11 (talk) 21:59, 11 May 2023 (UTC)