Wikipedia:WikiProject Spaceflight/Assessment/Requests/Archive 1


 * Solrad 4 is ready for B class assessment! --Neopeius (talk) 23:38, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
 * B-class, and close to GA  Kees08  (Talk)   18:53, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Solrad 4B is also ready for B class assessment. --Neopeius (talk) 02:05, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
 * B-class as well  Kees08  (Talk)   18:57, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Quite by accident, I seem to have made a Project Beacon article. I believe it qualifies for B class (and beyond).  --Neopeius (talk) 01:37, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * A few things could be worked on (as discussed in Discord), but B-class it is.  Kees08  (Talk)   19:03, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Solrad 6 is done. There's less there because much of it is still classified and because it was a very short mission.  So, for what we can learn, I think it's complete and could warrant a 'B'.  --Neopeius (talk) 21:49, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * B class. Gog the Mild (talk) 00:55, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks. :) --Neopeius (talk) 03:22, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I've been working on Pintle injector, I'm sure it's no longer a stub. Please review!Marianoberna (talk) 13:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I've reviewed it. Definite improvement.  I've given it a Start classification and indicated improvements that can take it higher.  Thank you for your work!  --Neopeius (talk) 18:14, 18 February 2019 (UTC)


 * I've taken your reccomendations and further improved the article Pintle_injector! Please review again, I think it's up to B or better standards! Marianoberna (talk) 22:21, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello Mariano. I substantially rearranged the header to be more readable.  Please see the Talk page for the main points.  I will review the rest of the body soon, but you may find value in applying the lessons from the header revision to the rest of the body for general readability. --Neopeius (talk) 04:00, 4 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Molniya (satellite) - well it's not a stub anymore --Spacepine (talk) 10:51, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
 * True! In fact, it's a solid B.  Good job!  Want to join us at the WP: SPFLT discord channel? :) --Neopeius (talk) 12:13, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
 * In honor of April 8, 1964, I've upgraded Gemini 1 to what I think is B status. At some point, it could use more polishing, but I think that's a good start.  --Neopeius (talk) 03:09, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Maplestrip reviewed it. Thanks! --Neopeius (talk) 21:24, 25 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello out there!


 * Could some of you good folk give my article a looksee? It's been stalled in FAC forever despite four supports and a neutral, and I think it's been polished as far as it can go.  Finishing the review will not only get another much-needed FA for this wikiproject, but I can then carry the lessons learned from that one to the others in the series.  GRAB/SOLRAD 1-4B has the makings of a Good Topic.


 * So please help. Give SOLRAD 1 a look-see and leave your decision on the archive page.


 * Thanks in advance!


 * --Neopeius (talk) 19:45, 11 April 2019 (UTC)


 * This is taken care of. Thank you.


 * Could someone give Vanguard TV5 a B-class review? I can then go and update all the other unsuccessful Vanguard launches (not that a failed orbit is really a failure, and even successful flights often have lots wrong with them!) --Neopeius (talk) 00:29, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Done. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 07:11, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you! --Neopeius (talk) 13:35, 26 April 2019 (UTC)


 * I expanded Tundra orbit with what I learned from Molniya orbit. Can someone check over it for a B-class review? Spacepine (talk) 13:00, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I shall be happy to (in about four hours, if no one beats me!) Thanks for working on it! --Neopeius (talk) 13:28, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello! I've upped the article to C status and left questions and comments on the Talk page.  Let me know if you have any questions as to why I made the revisions I did or asked the questions I asked. :) --Neopeius (talk) 16:44, 30 April 2019 (UTC)


 * I've nominated SOLRAD 2 for FA. It uses much of the same language as SOLRAD 1 (which got FA) and is pretty interesting in its own right.  Hope to see some familiar faces there. :) --Neopeius (talk) 16:05, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Could someone have a look at Geostationary orbit? I've done some work on it and would appreciate some input on scoping. --Spacepine (talk) 02:06, 26 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Please have a look to Vega flight VV15. I'd suggest C-class and mid-importance grading. Thanks a lot! benrem (talk) 18:18, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, I've given it a C-class and low-importance (new to assessments, so other editors input would be appreciated). --Spacepine (talk) 05:13, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for the assessment. benrem (talk) 20:49, 7 October 2019 (UTC)


 * I'm back! Would someone be so kind as to B-class review Explorer 22? --Neopeius (talk) 04:57, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
 * List of PSLV launches have a look. I think It should be List class with low importance. Brown Chocolate (talk) 05:49, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Would someone be willing to give Multi-Payload Processing Facility a B-class review? It's my first completely original article and I'm itching to get some feedback on it.– Jadebenn (talk &middot;&#32;contribs &middot;&#32;subpages) 10:55, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay -- I have given my thoughts. --Neopeius (talk) 14:11, 18 February 2020 (UTC)


 * At long long long too long last, SOLRAD_7A is finally ready for B class review. :) --Neopeius (talk) 23:07, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Okay, I gave it a shot! Can someone grade SEDSAT-1 against the B-Class requirements? Thanks! PedanticLlama (talk) 16:26, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
 * It's pretty good! I have a few suggestions. Want to meet me in the Discord channel to discuss? (we could go back and forth on the Talk page, but this will be quicker). --Neopeius (talk) 19:05, 18 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Could someone look over/review Space Shuttle? I did leave the pop culture section relatively unchanged/unimproved, but I have posted on the talk page about how I would like to remove that section. Thanks! Balon Greyjoy (talk) 08:21, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review ! Balon Greyjoy (talk) 23:44, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

List of missions to the Moon & List of human spaceflights BL-class review

 * Please BL-class review List of missions to the Moon. --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 15:13, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Please BL-class review List of human spaceflights. --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 15:13, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I didn't think that the spaceflight WikiProject had a BL class? Terasail &#91;Talk&#93; 23:32, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
 * It's been drafted at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spaceflight/Assessment/QualityV2Draft. Soumya, what is the status of this?
 * I saw the BL-class assessment in the assessments page when I was requesting to BL-class the articles. So I thought to BL-class some articles. --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 18:12, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

*At long last, I've updated Galactic Radiation and Background with language from my SOLRAD articles (particularly my F.A., SOLRAD 1) so I think it's good enough for G.A. review. When that's done, I can raise the whole topic to G.T. :) Thanks to anyone who wants to help with this. --Neopeius (talk) 05:25, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * thank you for reviewing GRAB. Would you be willing to do the same for SOLRAD 4 and SOLRAD 4B? Same topic, virtually identical articles, should be a breeze. I'd greatly appreciate it! --Neopeius (talk) 17:30, 15 December 2020 (UTC)