Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Discoveries/Log/2017/March

Antlion stubs
I've found and. Like and  (below), these were created by, apparently without discussion, in January 2017. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 23:04, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * has been busy... creating and rearranging templates and categories, apparently unaware of stub sorting and creation procedure. (Assuming good faith, here.) I'll leave a note on its talk page and see what ensues. Her Pegship (talk) 04:10, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Cleroidea stubs
I've found (34 transclusions) which doesn't use, and  (35 members) which doesn't use either  or. Here's the chronology as I see it: What shall we do about these? Fewer than 60 pages use these, so it's probably easiest to restore the template to a being a redirect, and delete the category again. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 20:34, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * 11:20, 25 August 2014: creates  (using the normal format for a stub cat page) following this proposal
 * 02:18, 26 August 2014: Dawynn creates under the same proposal
 * 11:10, 26 August 2014: Dawynn requests deletion of under WP:CSD; this is actioned by  at 14:19 the same day
 * 09:07, 21 November 2014: converts  to a redirect to  following this CfD discussion
 * 18:20, 6 February 2017: converts  back to a non-redirected (but misconstructed) template, apparently without discussion
 * 18:21, 6 February 2017: Caftaric recreates (using a non-standard format: there are two categories, nothing else), apparently also undiscussed
 * I agree, and the template should be adapted to asbox format as well. Her Pegship (talk) 16:18, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * seems to have boosted the category to 64 members but it is still in a highly non-standard format. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 00:23, 23 March 2017 (UTC)