Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Discoveries/Log/2017/November

Chinese Roman Catholic diocese stubs
I've found which was created out of process by, and populated improperly (direct use of category, since reverted). As it has 108 potential members, it could stay, provided that is created properly and used properly as well. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 19:26, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 * There was a PRChina-RC-diocese-stub approved back in 2008, but the category was approved as . Should I/we propose a revision? Her :Pegship 01:23, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If it was approved, then fine; but the name should fit in with the convention. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 09:09, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

More China-related stub categories
I've also found others created out of process by : and. I'm not sure what purpose the latter is intended to serve. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 19:56, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Quite apart from their being created out of process, the latter category says "This category is for categories for stub articles relating to the individual China." Oy vey. I will leave a comment on the user's talk page if that's OK with everyone. Her :Pegship 00:52, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I haven't left the note yet, but I have found that Tianjin-stub was actually approved in 2011, along with a bunch of other "geography of China" types. I/We can create the template for the Tianjin stub type in order to populate the stub cat properly, but I will still give Allenkong a note about . Her :Pegship 01:23, 6 November 2017 (UTC)