Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2010/June

Pterophoridae-stub: Cat scan indicates 76 articles for moth family Pterophoridae can be pulled from. Dawynn (talk) 11:20, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Support. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:27, 1 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Support Dr. Blofeld       White cat 16:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Coleophoridae-stub: Cat scan suggests 149 articles for moth family Coleophoridae, to be pulled out of oversized stub. Dawynn (talk) 11:14, 30 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Support. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:27, 1 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Support Dr. Blofeld       White cat 16:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Erebidae-stub: Family erebidae is a fairly recently defined moth family, taking some of the subfamilies that used to be classified as noctuidae. This would already be a parent category to existing stub categories (like, and ), along with housing other articles that fit in this family. This new category will help pull articles away from two oversized categories: and. Dawynn (talk) 11:09, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy support. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:26, 1 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Support Dr. Blofeld       White cat 16:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Found out that the Lepidoptera project is using the LepIndex as its primary resource -- a resource which does not recognize family Erebidae. At this time, I will not be building this template / category.  Dawynn (talk) 16:54, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Split of
This is in desperate need of splitting. I'm gradually working on sorting both this stub category and the main category. Both have over 4000 articles.

For now, splitting these by subfamilies: Dawynn (talk) 11:22, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Acontiinae-stub / . For  / Acontiinae. Cat Scan indicates 105 articles for now.
 * Amphipyrinae-stub / . For  / Amphipyrinae.  Cat Scan indicates 115 articles for now.
 * Cuculliinae-stub / . For  / Cuculliinae.  Cat Scan indicates 113 articles for now.
 * Calpinae-stub / . For  / Calpinae.  Cat Scan indicates 53 articles for now.  I'll work on sorting these in the main category.  I would think we could hit 60 pretty easily.
 * Pantheinae-stub / . For  / Pantheinae.  Cat Scan indicates 43 articles for now.  Again, once I can sort the main category, this could easily see 60 also.  Will build as upmerged template only, if I cannot boost the article count.
 * Speedy support -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 19:26, 29 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Support Dr. Blofeld       White cat 16:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Split of
Able to pull a couple categories out of here: Dawynn (talk) 13:37, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Chalcidoidea-stub / . Main article: Chalcid wasp.  Main category: .  Cat scan suggests 85 articles.  This will also be a parent category for.
 * Potter-wasp-stub / . Main article: Potter wasp.  Main category: .  Cat scan suggests 135 articles.
 * Vespidae-stub / . Main article: Vespidae.  Main category: .  This will be a parent category for, along with picking up a few other articles.
 * Support -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 21:03, 27 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Support Dr. Blofeld       White cat 16:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: Changed to . Dawynn (talk) 08:46, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Split of
These are in need of a good paring down, I think; right now the category contains 805 stubs. I think perhaps a breakdown by county might be in order? Thus the following:


 * Harju-geo-stub/
 * Hiiu-geo-stub/
 * IdaViru-geo-stub/
 * Järva-geo-stub/
 * Jõgeva-geo-stub/
 * Lääne-geo-stub/
 * LääneViru-geo-stub/
 * Pärnu-geo-stub/
 * Põlva-geo-stub/
 * Rapla-geo-stub/
 * Saare-geo-stub/
 * Tartu-geo-stub/
 * Valga-geo-stub/
 * Viljandi-geo-stub/
 * Võru-geo-stub/

Categories to follow as they become viable; Harju should be already, I think. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 05:49, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Support as per proposal. Waacstats (talk) 20:11, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Support Dr. Blofeld       White cat 16:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Please create. Somebody create the templates so I use for stub creation now?Starzynka (talk) 16:11, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Sawfly-stub
Main category:. Main article: Sawfly. Only 42 articles in the main category, so this will be an upmerge template for. Dawynn (talk) 15:43, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Support. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:09, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Support Dr. Blofeld       White cat 16:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

New template: Eulophidae-stub. Cat scan indicates that over 300 articles can be pulled from. Dawynn (talk) 15:39, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Support. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:09, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Support Dr. Blofeld       White cat 16:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The template already exists, is currently transcluded on 68 articles and I think a category should be speedily created according to S1. Svick (talk) 23:24, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Support speedy. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:11, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Support Dr. Blofeld       White cat 16:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Will pick up the articles under existing template NorthDakota-protected-area-stub. 66 articles. Dawynn (talk) 11:24, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - also I think Oklahoma will be nearing the threshhold soon. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:26, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

breakdown -- category requests
Official request for the following categories: Dawynn (talk) 11:57, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * -- 82 articles under Illinois-protected-area-stub
 * -- 37 articles under Virginia-protected-area-stub with 100 more waiting under
 * -- 32 articles under Washington-protected-area-stub with 91 more waiting under
 * -- 13 articles under Colorado-protected-area-stub with 54 more waiting under
 * Support all. I'll help with the re-stub-tagging later, too. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:11, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Luxembourg-writer-stub
Surprised we didn't have one of these already - at the very least, a stub tag would be useful. Category may follow, but not for a bit. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 18:26, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I thought these were already approved. It should be fine though as an S2 speedy, same with all other European countries that don't have a tag made. Just leave it upmerged until it gets large enough for a category. Borgarde (talk) 07:24, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Support Dr. Blofeld       White cat 16:49, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

breakdown
Looking for a speedy approval on these. Not sure how many will be able to become categories, but the national group is oversized. Looking to break this down by state. Montana-protected-area-stub and Florida-protected-area-stub already exist, with their own categories. Minnesota-protected-area-stub and Kansas-protected-area-stub also already exist. Asking for templates for the remaining 50 states:


 * Alabama-protected-area-stub
 * Alaska-protected-area-stub
 * Arizona-protected-area-stub
 * Arkansas-protected-area-stub
 * California-protected-area-stub
 * Colorado-protected-area-stub
 * Connecticut-protected-area-stub
 * Delaware-protected-area-stub
 * Georgia-protected-area-stub
 * Hawaii-protected-area-stub
 * Idaho-protected-area-stub
 * Illinois-protected-area-stub
 * Indiana-protected-area-stub
 * Iowa-protected-area-stub
 * Kentucky-protected-area-stub
 * Louisiana-protected-area-stub
 * Maine-protected-area-stub
 * Maryland-protected-area-stub
 * Massachusetts-protected-area-stub
 * Michigan-protected-area-stub
 * Mississippi-protected-area-stub
 * Missouri-protected-area-stub
 * Nebraska-protected-area-stub
 * Nevada-protected-area-stub
 * NewHampshire-protected-area-stub
 * NewJersey-protected-area-stub
 * NewMexico-protected-area-stub
 * NewYork-protected-area-stub
 * NorthCarolina-protected-area-stub
 * NorthDakota-protected-area-stub
 * Ohio-protected-area-stub
 * Oklahoma-protected-area-stub
 * Oregon-protected-area-stub
 * Pennsylvania-protected-area-stub
 * RhodeIsland-protected-area-stub
 * SouthCarolina-protected-area-stub
 * SouthDakota-protected-area-stub
 * Tennessee-protected-area-stub
 * Texas-protected-area-stub
 * Utah-protected-area-stub
 * Vermont-protected-area-stub
 * Virginia-protected-area-stub
 * Washington-protected-area-stub
 * WestVirginia-protected-area-stub
 * Wisconsin-protected-area-stub
 * Wyoming-protected-area-stub

In a similar vein to what has been done with, I'd like the following general area categories: These would all be categories without their own distinct templates. The appropriate individual state stubs would upmerge here, until categories could be built. Much of the format would follow what has been done with the similar geography stubs.

The state templates would then be double-upmerged to the general area categories, as well as the appropriate state geography category (see ). References to the individual state templates would be placed on the national protected area category, much like has been done with the geography stubs. Dawynn (talk) 13:08, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Support all. Cats where needed (I think there are some places where they will be).  -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 18:25, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * One change. Based on other categories, looks like the Georgia template should be GeorgiaUS-protected-area-stub, in order to differentiate it from the country. Dawynn (talk) 01:05, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

breakdown
Looking to break down the large Hymenoptera group. Dawynn (talk) 11:54, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * bombus-stub / . I would like a separate category specifically for bumblebees.  I count 63 articles for this one genus under the Hymenoptera stubs.  This will be placed under the .  Main category
 * wasp-stub / . This will be for the wasps.  Main category:.
 * Seems like a good idea. Waacstats (talk) 20:22, 12 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Support -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 18:25, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Biology organization stubs
I propose creating /biology-org-stub - scan suggests 106 articles. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:10, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Support, seems like a good choice. Waacstats (talk) 20:23, 12 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Support -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 18:25, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Split of
This isn't oversized as yet, but it's growing - 600+ stubs as of last count. Most of them are state-level politicians. I know something was done with not too long ago; perhaps it's time to consider doing something similar here? -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 18:37, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Support speedily. Let me know if you need sorting help. 209.6.134.38 (talk) 21:16, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

New category request for template Eidos-stub. I started loading with *anything* to do with Eidos Interactive, so this is not just restricted to their games. However, since there is no main category for Eidos, I will probably assign this to the. Requesting approval for speedy creation, as there are now more than 60 articles under this template. Dawynn (talk) 18:09, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Support. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 18:33, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Split from European church stubs.Starzynka (talk) 09:36, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * 134 articles linking to Spain-church-stub = Easy support Waacstats (talk) 12:44, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Support, naturalmente. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 13:38, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Support 209.6.134.38 (talk) 21:16, 5 June 2010 (UTC)