Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2017/June

Create HK biz bio stub. PetScan shows 83 stubs in. See all Hong Kong stub templates here. —  A L T E R C A R I  ✍ 02:49, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Why that name for the template? To fit in with established conventions, it would surely be, which already exists. Similarly, the category would be . -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 07:48, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Um. Wew. How did I miss that? I'll just quietly let myself out. —  A L T E R C A R I  ✍ 07:53, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Create NCP-politician-stub
 * PetScan shows 87 results --Skr15081997 (talk) 15:48, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 19:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * INC-politician-stub / exists; does this cover the same ground? Her Pegship (talk) 21:37, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * , I'd also like to know this. —  A L T E R C A R I  ✍ 02:49, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Both are different parties. --Skr15081997 (talk) 13:23, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Create SP-politician-stub
 * PetScan shows 75 pages --Skr15081997 (talk) 15:42, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 19:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Support, if constructed as . Her Pegship (talk) 21:40, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Support  Sufficient need. —  A L T E R C A R I  ✍ 02:49, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Currently there are over 20 different stub tags filling into this category, and it has ~900 pages in it. Some of these stub tags are clearly big enough to merit their own categories, while others could merit their own categories as they have a significant number of articles and it would reduce the number in the master category. I do not believe that having such a large category is helpful for anyone. My proposal is as follows:
 * Create a category for: (>60 articles)
 * Cyprus-footyclub-stub (149 articles)
 * Hungary-footyclub-stub (113 articles)
 * Netherlands-footyclub-stub (79 articles)
 * Probably create a category for: (>30, <60 articles)
 * Armenia-footyclub-stub (57 articles)
 * Azerbaijan-footyclub-stub (48 articles)
 * Latvia-footyclub-stub (48 articles)
 * Georgia-footyclub-stub (45 articles)
 * Albania-footyclub-stub (36 articles)

I would also like to propose the creation of Gibraltar-footyclub-stub as currently there are 19 pages with the template Europe-footyclub-stub, all teams from Gibraltar. Currently there are many country football club stub tags which are on less than 19 pages and I believe it would make sense to specify from Europe. Stub tags exist with fewer pages for clubs from Andorra (11), Austria (16), Greenland (15), Ireland (8), Isle of Man (9), Kosovo (13), Liechtenstein (5), Luxembourg (16), Montenegro (15), San Marino (11) and Slovenia (17).

Thanks, JDWFC (talk) 11:46, 31 May 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 19:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I support the Cyprus, Hungary, & Netherlands categories but would rather keep the rest of the templates upmerged until they actually reach 60+ articles. Also support formation of the Gibraltar template, upmerged to the Europe category, same reason. Her Pegship (talk) 21:32, 8 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Support There is evidence that the 60 rule isn't observed in this area. —  A L T E R C A R I  ✍ 02:49, 19 June 2017 (UTC)