Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2023/December

Bulbophyllum (Asia-Pacific clade)
I recently successfully proposed subcategories for, but am unsure what I should name the stub templates for the new categories. Any ideas? Thanks, Andumé (talk) 04:56, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Kursk Oblast geography stubs
Currently at 812 articles; I propose we create upmerged templates for each of its districts: If fewer templates are desired, let me know and I'll chase down possible article counts for each district. Her Pegship (?) 23:31, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
 * BelovskyRU-geo-stub
 * Bolshesoldatsky-geo-stub
 * Cheremisinovsky-geo-stub
 * Dmitriyevsky-geo-stub
 * Fatezhsky-geo-stub - 185
 * Glushkovsky-geo-stub
 * Gorshechensky-geo-stub
 * Kastorensky-geo-stub
 * Khomutovsky-geo-stub
 * Konyshyovsky-geo-stub - 89
 * Korenevsky-geo-stub
 * KurchatovskyRU-geo-stub - 55
 * Kursky-geo-stub - 184
 * Lgovsky-geo-stub - 90
 * ManturovskyRU-geo-stub
 * Medvensky-geo-stub - 92
 * Oboyansky-geo-stub
 * OktyabrskyRU-geo-stub - 91
 * Ponyrovsky-geo-stub
 * Pristensky-geo-stub
 * Rylsky-geo-stub
 * Shchigrovsky-geo-stub
 * Solntsevsky-geo-stub
 * SovetskyRU-geo-stub
 * Sudzhansky-geo-stub
 * Timsky-geo-stub
 * Zheleznogorsky-geo-stub
 * Zolotukhinsky-geo-stub
 * ETA: I've put in the article counts that I've been able to find, so I amend my proposal to create only templates for those with article counts. Her Pegship (?) 21:46, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
 * No opposition, thus I will create templates & cats for these:
 * Fatezhsky-geo-stub /
 * Konyshyovsky-geo-stub /
 * Kursky-geo-stub /
 * Lgovsky-geo-stub /
 * Medvensky-geo-stub /
 * OktyabrskyRU-geo-stub /
 * and an upmerged template for KurchatovskyRU-geo-stub until it hits 60. Her Pegship (?) 19:59, 21 December 2023 (UTC)three Oktyabrsky Districts in Russia, I'm guessing that disambiguation in the template might be required, thus, I propose further the use of the ISO code for Kursk Oblast, thusly: OktyabrskyKRS-geo-stub. OK? Her Pegship (?) 21:01, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Pyrausta (moth)-stub/Pyrausta (moth) stubs
Calling all entomologists(?) - This is an awkward format for a stub template; I'm not sure the "(moth)" distinction is necessary in the template, though it seems fine in the category name. Before I propose pyrausta (moth)-stub for renaming to pyrausta-stub, does anyone here have an opinion? Thanks. Her Pegship (?) 18:39, 4 December 2023 (UTC)