Wikipedia:WikiProject Technology/Assessment

The Assessment department finds technological articles and rate them on Quality scale.

The articles are rated by examining them and comparing them to the Quality scale. A template is then place on the article's talk page stating that the article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology and displaying what rating the article has been given when compared to the Quality scale.

Requests for assessment
Technological articles can be found in Category:Technology and its subcategories
 * Éolienne Bollée
 * Rosalind Picard
 * UE Boom
 * Error concealment
 * Prusa i3
 * Ethernet
 * Stereolithography
 * Incremental encoder -- please reassess due to major rewrite and content expansion
 * OnePlus Nord
 * Asus ZenFone 6
 * Lorgnette -- please assess this stub, feel like it should be at least a start
 * Nuclear weapon design -- I am uncertain what the procedure is in this project. Over on Military History I could just downgrade it myself, but I don't know what you project's rules are. Either way, the article may have been B-class when reviewed many years ago, but now it is a mess with 98 citation needed by my count today. It is also awkwardly structured. Over on the Military History project I am looking for other editors to help rewrite the whole thing.Kylesenior (talk) 05:08, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Cryogenic gas plant

Template

 * WikiProject Technology

Requests for assessment
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.


 * VHS - Please assess this article for "B" grade. I've made some significant additions and changes. I think the article fulfills the criteria as a "B" article. Thank you! Groink (talk) 08:00, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Millenniata - Please assess this article for "B" grade. I rewrote it as NPoV.  I believe the company itself is only notable for the M-DISC technology (a type of specialty DVD-R), but I'm not sure of the best way to handle that. Advice appreciated! &mdash;Hobart (talk) 01:44, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I noticed that in Talk:Fucking Machines that this unfortunate article has a Good Article status from this WikiProject. This status needs to be reconsidered and likely removed. Rlsheehan (talk) 19:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)