Wikipedia:WikiProject Tree of Life/Cladogram requests/Archive 5

Ptilinopus
Hey again, I need another cladogram from here, this time all the species in the genus (i.e. the entire tree). AryKun (talk) 12:17, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

WIPHiroizmeh (Talk | Contributions) 18:23, 28 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The tree's fine how it is now as an exact copy of the paper; anyone is free to make any tweaks to it, especially at the base of the tree where existing groups are left out. Hiroizmeh (Talk | Contributions) 01:21, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Guemesia
Does anyone have a cladogram of the new abelisaurid? I can't find it online. Thanks! Atlantis536 (talk) 01:29, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Institutional access can be very beneficial. Here you go IJReid { {T - C - D - R} } 16:57, 12 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Atlantis536 (talk) 01:13, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Phorusrhacidae
Hi, seems we don't have any complete Phorusrhacidae cladograms, but there's one here (fig. 10) I'd like to include in Kelenken that I'm working on, and can of course be used in all the relevant articles. Thanks. FunkMonk (talk) 02:43, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
 * In the meantime I've added an older cladogram from 2011 I found on the Dutch Wikipedia, but I think this newer cladogram might be more appropriate. FunkMonk (talk) 03:13, 12 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Modified from German Wikipedia (de:Phorusrhacidae). —  Jts1882 &#124; talk 08:49, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Added labels for the polyphyletic and paraphyletic subfamilies. I note the taxonomic listing uses Brontornithinae, while this paper uses Physornithinae because they find Brontornis with anseriforms. —  Jts1882 &#124; talk 09:41, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks, could it be modified so it is more in line with the labeling in the paper? Because it seems some of the labels in the German article are a bit WP:synthy. And can Cariamidae be added? And perhaps add species to genera that aren't monospecific (Mesembriornis, Psilopterus)? FunkMonk (talk) 18:16, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I'll try and add species tomorrow. The labels "psilopterines" and 'true "terror birds"' are taken from the text (first paragraph on p16). —  Jts1882 &#124; talk 20:17, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I've added all the species for consistency. A few new redirects are needed. I added a label for genus Psilopterus, but it might look better without. —  Jts1882 &#124; talk 08:39, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks, this could be used in all the relevant articles! FunkMonk (talk) 16:02, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Bornean stubtail
Hey, I want a cladogram for Bornean stubtail from in here. I need the tree for clade 7 in Figure 4. Only a species level tree is needed, although the diagram in the paper shows to subspecies level population. AryKun (talk) 16:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Is that all you wanted? I've give the figure version and one with the revised names. —  Jts1882 &#124; talk 10:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Bare-headed laughingthrush
Hey, me again, this time for bare-headed laughingthrush. I need Figure 3 (b) (the cladogram for the clade formed by Melanocichla and Pomatorhinus) from here. AryKun (talk) 16:22, 27 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I think this is what you requested. —  Jts1882 &#124; talk 11:03, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Help with white swamphen cladogram
Due to a confusing figure in a DNA study, I didn't include a cladogram in the white swamphen (Porphyrio albus) article, but since it will soon be TFA, I thought it was time to revisit the issue, and see if someone could find a solution. This paper says it includes the white swamphen among its samples, and states which species it groups with, the problem is that as far as I can see, the white swamphen (P. albus) is not included in the cladogram (Figure 1. C)? Am I overlooking something, or is there a way to include it? Looking closer, it appears it may be labeled as "6" in the coloured part of the cladogram, but I have no idea how that would be translated into code? FunkMonk (talk) 16:56, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't see why the numbers can't be replaced with the species names following the figure caption? Lythronaxargestes (talk &#124; contribs) 17:11, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * It looks like #6 is sister to a pink box, which looks like it is the subspecies indicus - but the rest of those are way up in another clade. (It appears that they used the DNA from 8 different individuals of indicus in the study.) Perhaps you could ignore that one as an outlier, but then we are getting into original research & synth issues. And then there is the whole mess that is "Clade B" - which I suppose could be shown as a polytomy... I don't think there is a way you can use this study to create a cladogram. Cougroyalty (talk) 17:24, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that was what I was worried about, it looks like a mess to me, but I was wondering if someone else was able to decipher it. Unless P. indicus could just be repeated? FunkMonk (talk) 17:30, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Could you maybe condense all of the Porphyrio porphyrio subspecies together, and then show them in a polytomy with 4, 5 and 6? Maybe with a comment about it still inconclusive? It could look like this:


 * Pretty simple. But I'm not sure if this sort of condensing is allowable... Cougroyalty (talk) 17:57, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * As long as it doesn't add "new" topography, I think it should be ok. The article currently already states "according to the biologists, such results (based on ancient DNA sources) should be treated with caution. Although many purple swamphen taxa had been considered subspecies of the species P. porphyrio, they considered this a paraphyletic (unnatural) grouping since they found different species to group among the subspecies", so a margin of error should be clear. FunkMonk (talk) 18:08, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I wonder what thinks? FunkMonk (talk) 00:59, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
 * As a starting point, let's try and agree what Fig 1C shows. I've shaded the P. p. porphyrio subspecies and used the double line to indicate the paraphylly of P. p. melanotus with respect to P. p. bellus.


 * Is this how everyone reads the cladogram? —  Jts1882 &#124; talk 12:47, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I've added a version using the new species names as recognised by the IOC. Subspecies are lumped with the species (i.e. bellus with melanotus and seistanicus with poliocephalus). The only questionable part is the omission of the indicus sample that was sister to the white swamphen. —  Jts1882 &#124; talk 13:25, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I think it's best to follow the taxonomy of the paper (no retroactive lumping), as it reflects the state of understanding at the time. What is cladogram 2 in relation to 1? FunkMonk (talk) 14:19, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Yup, I agree with your 1st and 3rd cladograms as accurate representations. I much prefer the 2nd cladogram, but I'm not sure if it is allowable in regards to WP:Original Research. And as always, I am impressed with your cladogram skills! Cougroyalty (talk) 14:21, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Ah, now I see 2 has some lumping too. Well, I'd prefer 1 then, as reflecting the paper closest, but yeah, nice work. FunkMonk (talk) 14:42, 28 May 2022 (UTC)


 * If I use the first one, where would I put common names not yet listed, as I usually do? FunkMonk (talk) 18:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * If you compare between the two difs here, it should be good to display how the cladelabels section is actually its own column where the % change the shift down from the top of the clade template. IJReid { {T - C - D - R} } 19:14, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm just too dumb with these things, I can't even add cladogram one without the box without breaking the code. Can a version of it without border and with space for the rest of the common names be made so I can add it? FunkMonk (talk) 19:41, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Hows this? labels text can be deleted without causing any issues. Percentages can also be adjusted to center it more. IJReid { {T - C - D - R} } 21:04, 29 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks! I'll try to add that soon. FunkMonk (talk) 21:14, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I've now added the cladogram with all names, if that looks alright. FunkMonk (talk) 17:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Cerulean warbler
Hi! I'd like a cladogram for Cerulean warbler. Well, two, actually. The first is here. , figure 1. I would like the clade of Dendroica caerulescens and D. striata.

The second one is here. , figure 1. I would like the clade of Setophaga pitayumi and S. pensylvanica. Sub31k (talk) 04:53, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Are these ok? —Trilletrollet [ Talk &#124; Contribs ] 11:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * @Trilletrollet: They're great, thank you! I will be changing the former template to the modern synonyms to match the current nomenclature, as the phylogeny has been cited that way in papers after the Dendroica-Setophaga-Parula merge, with Setophaga as the genus. Thank you! Sub31k (talk) 13:35, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Artiopoda
Can i request that the cladogram from https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/geological-magazine/article/new-small-softbodied-nontrilobite-artiopod-from-the-cambrian-stage-4-guanshan-biota/0F7D45A289130BB27099B4E260739270 (Open access) including only the members of Artiopoda. Either one of the implied weights is fine, but I don't want the equal weights one. Thanks again. Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:00, 15 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Is that good? It's "Parsimony - implied weights (k=4,5)", if you want the other one I can modify it quite easily. Larrayal (talk) 18:24, 15 July 2022 (UTC)


 * That's great, thanks. Hemiauchenia (talk) 19:18, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Azhdarchidae from Quetzalcoatlus redescription
Could use the part of "figure 1. (Continued)" here showing Azhdarchiformes, thanks. For Phosphatodraco, but would also be useful elsewhere. FunkMonk (talk) 01:04, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Here it is. IJReid { {T - C - D - R} } 01:14, 10 August 2022 (UTC)


 * That was quick, thanks! FunkMonk (talk) 02:51, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Varanidae
I can I request the cladogram from Dong et al. 2022 be coded up? freely accessible image of the cladogram. I'd like to only include taxa within node "d" of the cladogram (which the paper defines as Varanidae), I'd also like all of the Varanus species to be ommited in favour of a single Varanus node. Many thanks in advance. Hemiauchenia (talk) 11:37, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Is this ok? —Trilletrollet [ Talk &#124; Contribs ] 15:18, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, this is great. Thank you very much! Hemiauchenia (talk) 15:25, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Adephaga phylogeny
Hi, can I request that this cladogram be coded up. Truncated to families only please, with unabbreviated names. Abbrevations: Trachy., Trachypachidae; Halip., Haliplidae; Meru., Meruidae; Noter., Noteridae; Hygrob., Hygrobiidae; Aspidyt., Aspidytidae; Amphiz., Amphizoidae. I would like "Aspidytidae" to be untruncated to show the paraphyly of the family. Many thanks again. Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:20, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, I'd actually like this one to be done instead. Sorry for the confusion. Same requirements as before, but Aspidytidae was recovered as monophyletic in this one, it can just all be subsumed under one label. Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:39, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Done. Lythronaxargestes (talk &#124; contribs) 17:47, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Much appreciated. Hemiauchenia (talk) 18:59, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Panperissodactyla
Hi, can I request the cladogram from Chimento et al. to be coded up? Here is a freely accessible image of the cladogram. I would only like to include the panperissodactyl taxa (e.g. kollpaniids, didolodontids/protolipternids and litopterns as well as perissodactyls). Thanks in advance. Magnatyrannus (talk &#124; contribs) 04:03, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Does this look right? -SlvrHwk (talk) 06:57, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, it does. Thank you very much! Magnatyrannus (talk &#124; contribs) 10:55, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Ephemeroptera
Hi, can I request the phylogeny from this image be coded up? Many thanks Hemiauchenia (talk) 01:38, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Here you go. I made one with dashed lines too just in case. —Trilletrollet [ Talk &#124; Contribs ] 17:29, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Interatheriinae
Hi, can I request the cladogram from Vera et al. 2017 (fig. 9) be coded up? I'm only interested in including the interatheriine taxa. Many thanks. Magnatyrannus (talk &#124; contribs) 00:57, 30 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Version as shown in the paper:


 * Version without "Deseadan interatheres":