Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Assessment/Cyclone Percy

Archived discussion. Current status: 

Possibly ether B, GA or A class. Storm05 15:50, 9 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I marked it as B class. All that needs to be done is fix some of grammar and spelling errors. Good job for a storm that caused no deaths. Hurricanehink 21:27, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I did a general copyedit and I think its ready for GA Class or higher, anyone agree? Storm05 19:06, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Nominated for GA. Tito xd (?!? - help us) 19:49, 10 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Now a GA. So, should it be bumped up to A-Class? Tito xd (?!? - help us) 00:00, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Not quite A class. The spelling and grammar need to be fixed still. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 00:09, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I went through the article and cleaned it up before GA status... are there any other mistakes I didn't catch? Tito xd (?!? - help us) 00:17, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, never mind then. If possible, the intro should be two paragraphs, and someone should aks Jdorje for a track map. Also, are there any more pictures? Those things are relatively little, so I guess A class sounds good. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 00:31, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Okay its A-Class, what it takes to get this article to FA-Class? Storm05 18:34, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Damage totals, more pictures, a track map, and more organization to the storm history. 14 lines is a little much for one paragraph. Also, more impact, if possible. There's only three paragraphs on impact. If that's all the storm did, then that's fine, but more would be nice. FA-Class is possible for this article, though it will have to wait. You should bring it up at the discussion page. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 21:36, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Based on the above criteria, it is missing cite web formatting for A class. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 03:08, 1 July 2006 (UTC) Downgraded to GA-Class because it still does not have cite web formatting. This is actually a requirement for GA-Class, so if cite web formatting is not added and the article is not cleaned up, it could be put up for review or be delisted. I'll probably fix the refs later. --Core des at talk! 20:19, 25 September 2006 (UTC)