Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Assessment/Cyclone Vance

Cyclone Vance
Archived discussion. Current status: 

It would need more impact to be A-Class. Also, if the name "Vance" was retired, what was it replaced with? Free impact pictures would be nice. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 19:25, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I Have no idea what name replaced Vance and I doubt there are any free impact pictures for australian tropical cyclones. Storm05 14:10, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * You can probably work the replacement name from the current list, the fact it was on the Darwin list and knowledge of what storms formed around it. Impact pics are hard to get hold of but by no means impossible. A second satellite pic would probably help reduce that deficit. Other problems: This is an Australian storm, what Australian category was it? The wikilinking in the article is poor - use pipes to link to Exmouth, Western Australia not Exmouth, Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale not Category 4 and so on. There's numerous unexplained technical things, what is a "red alert"? That should link to somewhere appropriate or be explained. And I agree with Madeline, more impact would be very nice.--Nilfanion (talk) 14:50, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, I know what the name was replaced with, it was Verdun. I had already put in the Australian category. I think another thing is that the units should really be metric instead of imperial because the cyclone happened in Australia. RaNdOm26 11:15, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

It needs more impact. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 04:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC)