Wikipedia:WikiProject Turkey/Current tasks

{| width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" valign="top"|


 * style="background-color:#FFFFFF" valign="top" |
 * style="background-color:#FFFFFF" valign="top" |

{| width="100%" style="background-color:#FFFFFF; padding:5px; border-bottom:1px solid #000; border-left:1px solid #000; border-right:1px solid #000; " cellspacing="5" valign="top"|


 * style="background-color:#E0FFFF;padding:0px" valign="top" |
 * style="background-color:#E0FFFF;padding:0px" valign="top" |

WikiProject Turkey

Article Improvement Drives

 * Turkish language to FA
 * Turkish people to GA
 * Turkish philosophy to Start

Layouts

 * There is a need for standardisation of same kind of articles; i.e. City articles have many different layouts, Biographies, Geographic places, cuisine related, music related also.
 * We must have a definite layout for Provinces, another one for cities, another one for mountains, another one for ministries and so on.
 * A sample Layout for Provinces; WikiProject Turkey/Current tasks/layout/province
 * Comments and ideas needed..

WPTR tagging
Tagging the talk pages of articles with WPTR puts them in project scope and identifies them via various categories to the project.


 * New articles - New articles that may be relevant to WikiProject Turkey should be reviewed daily and any new articles that are in project scope should be tagged.
 * Data - WikiProject Turkey/New article announcements, updated by bot.
 * Frequency - Daily
 * Taskforce
 * Task - Tag in-scope articles with
 * Result - Tagged articles appear in Category:Unassessed Turkey articles and Category:Unknown-importance Turkey articles and are kept track of by the project.
 * Can be automated? - NO Collection of raw data is automated, but a human is needed to select which of these is in project scope.


 * Turkey-stubs - These are articles tagged on the main page as a stub article related to Turkey. These should be brought into project scope.
 * Data - Category:Turkey stubs
 * Frequency - Quarterly
 * Taskforce
 * Task - All the articles in this category should have
 * Compare members of Category:Turkey stubs with Category:Stub-Class Turkey articles. For those articles in Category:Turkey stubs, but not in Category:Stub-Class Turkey articles:
 * No talk page: create talk page with
 * Talk page, without WPTR and no talkheader: prepend talk page with
 * Talk page, without WPTR but with talkheader: insert after talkheader
 * Talk page, with WPTR, but with no class assigned (present in Category:Unassessed Turkey articles): update WPTR with
 * Talk page, with WPTR, not present in Category:Unassessed Turkey articles: examine article to see whether it is of stub quality. If so, re-rate to If not, remove stub tag from main page.
 * Result - Turkey-stubs ranked as Stub-Class within WPTR, stubs that have progressed have stub-tags removed, Stub-Class articles wrongly classified as something else re-ranked to Stub-Class.
 * Can be automated - YES All tasks aside from re-ranking either to Stub-Class or having main article stub tag removed can be automated.
 * Last done: (Add date when this task was last carried out)
 * Turkey-cuisine-stubs - These are articles tagged on the main page as a stub article related to cuisine of Turkey. These should be brought into project scope and also to the attention of Food and Drink Project
 * Data - Category:Turkish cuisine stubs
 * Frequency - Quarterly
 * Taskforce
 * Task - All the articles in this category should have
 * Compare members of Category:Turkish cuisine stubs with Category:Stub-Class Turkey articles. For those articles in Category:Turkish cuisine stubs, but not in Category:Stub-Class Turkey articles:
 * No talk page: create talk page with
 * Treatment of : All pages in this category should be tagged with the template. Add all templates that are missing.
 * Talk page, without WPTR and no talkheader: prepend talk page with
 * Talk page, without WPTR but with talkheader: insert after talkheader
 * Talk page, with WPTR, but with no class assigned (present in Category:Unassessed Turkey articles): update WPTR with
 * Talk page, with WPTR, not present in Category:Unassessed Turkey articles: examine article to see whether it is of stub quality. If so, re-rate to If not, remove stub tag from main page.
 * Result - Turkey-cuisine-stubs ranked as Stub-Class within WPTR, and made known to Food and Drink project, stubs that have progressed have stub-tags removed, Stub-Class articles wrongly classified as something else re-ranked to Stub-Class.
 * Can be automated - YES All tasks aside from re-ranking either to Stub-Class or having main article stub tag removed can be automated.
 * Last done: (Add date when this task was last carried out)

Development and needed articles

 * Needed articles
 * Please tag any redlink articles talk page with ;WPTR, "class=Needed" . These links will be automatically listed under the category in above link.

Rivers of Turkey

 * There is a short list for rivers; List of rivers of Turkey need to development.
 * an article Rivers of Turkey we may need with short infos about rivers

Other

 * Islam in Turkey - A few copyedit, wikifying and finding references, could make into GA.
 * Mountains of Turkey need to development.
 * Lakes of Turkey created.
 * Islands of Turkey created
 * Peninsulas of Turkey created (as of Dec 6, 2009)
 * Bays of Turkey created (as of Dec 3, 2009)
 * TÜSİAD-KalDer National Quality Awards for inclusion in List of national quality awards and Category:Turkish awards.  WP:RS might be found in Turkish business publications or college textbooks on subjects like Total quality management or Six Sigma (for example, ).

Talk:Turkish_War_of_Independence
Hi everybody,

could someone take a look at this little problem here? The thing is that some statistics about Muslim/Turkish(?) casualties are wrongly cited from sources, but now two editors are simply removing the category of Muslim casualties altogether, leaving only Greek and Armenian figures. I am not sure, but I feel this might even be done on purpose, the editors do not engage in discussion, so some help would be appreciated. Thank you, 82.217.116.224 (talk) 09:42, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:MOPAK
I managed to get a reprieve for this Turkish article into draftspace about a Turkish paper pulp company called MOPAK; however, I could not find enough RS to save it properly (see Articles for deletion/MOPAK). There is very little on it in English websites. I was wondering if there are any Turkish editors who could take a look at it in draftspace and see if they can find some Turkish references that would help it meet WP:GNG? Otherwise, it will get deleted in draftspace. Or perhaps, Turkish editors might not consider it worth saving? Britishfinance (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Talk:Good Party
Publicising this - Talk:Good Party - Rfc here, per WP:RFCTP. It really needs input from more editors. Please place your views on the linked talk page. Thanks. Helper201 (talk) 13:02, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * }
 * }