Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Assessment/A-Class review/Interstate 37


 * The following is an archived roads review. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the review was promote to A-Class. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 02:05, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Interstate 37 (4 net support votes)
review
 * Suggestion: Promote to A-Class
 * Nominator's comments: Just recently passed GA and all issues from that review have been addressed.
 * Nominated by: Holderca1talk 13:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment:

Overall very well done. I only have a few nit-pic items that I'm suggesting.
 * History: The 2nd and 3rd paragraphs were hard for me to follow. The bulk of these sentences are stating, the freeway was extended to street X, then later extended to street Y. Without a map or familiarity with the area this is tough to visualize. Although this information is in the ELG, perhaps some more info to give context. Suggestions: The freeway was extended 1 mile to street X, the freeway was extended from the northern extents of Corpus Cristi to downtown at street Y, or one final extension to the southern suburbs at street Z. Something like that?
 * Route description: Suggest: As I-37 enters the San Antonio city limits, it intersects the northern terminus of US 181. (eliminate the redundant words) Similarly "designated the Lucian Adams Freeway, after the World War II veteran".

Other than that looks good. Davemeistermoab (talk) 05:01, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'm not familiar with the area either, but I will see what I can do to clarify things. I took care of the the second bullet.  --Holderca1talk 13:22, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, I reworked the second paragraph, let me know if that helps and I will rework the rest of the section. --Holderca1talk 13:51, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, that does help. I'd try to avoid using a milage figure for every extension if you can think of another way to describe it, but even with just the milage it adds context (short extensions, not massive extensions, etc.)Davemeistermoab (talk)
 * I can't think of another way to describe other than by mileage or cross street. The section I edited is entirely within the Corpus Christi city limits and those have most likely changed from when the freeway was built anyway.  --Holderca1talk 12:26, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * In that case I'd say continue on with adding the milage's. If that's all the information you have so be it. The only other thing I can think of is if somebody has an archive of historical maps to the area.Davemeistermoab (talk) 04:25, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Support. Changing vote to support. My concerns have been addressed.Davemeistermoab (talk) 05:12, 16 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Support. Seriously. At first glance, I thought the route description section was being under-referenced, but then I realized that entire paragraphs were being properly referenced to a single source.  The only issue I can see is actually with a template, not the article (hence it's not affecting my support) – the phrase "Almost-freeway" has got to go from San Antonio freeways. --  K é iryn  talk 11:53, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The template has been fixed. --Holderca1talk 13:31, 15 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Support Issues have been resolved. --Rschen7754 (T C) 04:15, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The above is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.