Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Assessment/A-Class review/Interstate 70 in Colorado


 * The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.  No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Interstate 70 in Colorado
review
 * Suggestion: Promote to A-Class
 * Nominator's comments: I think this is now ready. This was actually not difficult to research, one of the more well documented freeways, the challenge was extracting and summerizing a ton of info. I hope with your help, this can reach an FA, if there ever was a Interstate Highway deserving of an FA article, this would be on the short list.
 * Nominated by: Dave (talk) 05:45, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * First comment occurred: 21:49, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Closing as promote by Imzadi1979 (talk) 03:02, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Review by CG
 * Support - This article exceeds all requirements and is full of useful information. –CG 21:49, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Did you read the article? --Rschen7754 (T C) 01:04, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, Yes I did. –CG 01:29, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Rschen, did you? I need all the help I can get =-) Dave (talk) 03:48, 10 June 2009 (UTC)


 * My issues have been resolved, so I will Support the article. Dough4872 (talk) 16:43, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

As far as I can tell, all of the missing non-breaking spaces are now in place, so with the combination of that done and all of my other concerns above resolved, I now support the promotion of this article. –  T M F 00:31, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for doing that. I thought I got them all, but I get cross-eyed after re-reading an article a dozen times in a day. =-) Dave (talk) 16:43, 23 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Review by LJ
 * Comments on article improvement...


 * LJ, Thanks for this thorough review. Something has come up that is consuming most of my free time. Please excuse that it will take some time to get to all these.Dave (talk) 03:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Understood, Dave. Take care of business, the review isn't going anywhere... --LJ (talk) 05:04, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * DONE. I hope, I hope I hope =-) Please advise if you have additional concerns.Dave (talk) 05:24, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I have no further concerns and all previous concerns have been addressed to my satisfaction. I support promotion of this article to A-Class. --LJ (talk) 09:32, 29 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Review by Admrboltz


 * I support --Admrboltz (talk) 13:29, 2 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This article can be promoted to A-Class by a non-reviewer now that it has four supports, the required ACR minimum. –CG 17:53, 2 August 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.