Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Assessment/A-Class review/M-107 (Michigan highway)


 * The following is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was promote to A-Class. Mitch 32(UP) 00:29, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

M-107 (Michigan highway) (4 net support votes)
review
 * Suggestion: Promote to A-Class
 * Nominator's comments: The next nomination for MSHP
 * Nominated by: Imzadi1979 (talk) 00:56, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Support - Looks good. The RD looks very good with the pictures. ĈőмρǖтέŗĠύʎ890100 (t ↔ Ĕ ↔ ώ) 01:36, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Comments from Admrb♉ltz (t • c • [ log]) (02:21, 15 August 2008 (UTC))
 * WP:OVERLINK: please delink the units of measurement in the lead
 * Images check out
 * External links check out
 * Links pulled. Imzadi1979 (talk) 03:44, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Support -- Admrb♉ltz (t • c • [ log]) 03:46, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Comments Almost there, a couple of nit-pics Dave (talk)
 * Question: shouldn't "Main article: Lake of the Clouds (Michigan)" use a pipe link to eliminate the (Michigan)? (I don't know, I'm asking an honest question)
 * Peacock terms: "virgin wilderness and stunning vistas" In the US there is a legal definition of wilderness, that basically means undisturbed land, protected from all development so it remains so in perpetuity. So if it's legally declared wilderness, the word virgin is redundant. If it's not legally declared wilderness, maybe change to something like "wilderness grade" or just virgin land or pristine land, etc. etc.  Then "stunning vistas" How about describing the vista instead of just saying stunning I.E. "vistas of Lake Superior, wildlife such as deer and eagles, and old growth forests"...
 * Gap in history? Twenty years passed from when the designation was created to when the highway was dedicated? Do you know why the delay? if so explain.


 * Not sure why the gap in time. The book doesn't say either. I edited that paragraph from the LotC article. I found out how to pipe trick that template as well. Imzadi1979 (talk) 04:14, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Support issues resolved to my satisfaction Dave (talk) 05:01, 21 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Support - Well-referenced and interesting article, and Imzadi addressed my main concern about it on IRC. - Algorerhythms (talk) 04:43, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above is an archived roads A-class review. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.