Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Assessment/A-Class review/New Jersey Route 33

New Jersey Route 33

 * The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.  No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article was not promoted -- T M F Let's Go Mets - Stats 01:13, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

review
 * Suggestion: Promote to A-Class
 * Nominator's comments: New Jersey Route 33 has been a GA for about 5 months now. I requested a peer review at WP:PR and nothing really happened. I've decided to send it here for an opinion
 * Nominated by:.Mitch32contribs 23:15, 15 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Oppose. The following issues need to be resolved (I am simply talking about grammar here, not criteria - before we address the criteria, the grammar issues need to be resolved): --Rschen7754 (T C) 01:43, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Remove the 2nd paragraph of the lead.
 * Route des: first sentence would be better in the lead.
 * After, after, after... find another word.
 * Again with "avenue."
 * "what would have been a Route 33 freeway from Neptune to Trenton" Restructure. Route 33 should not be an adjective.
 * "scaled back" be more specific.
 * "Instead, a diamond interchange was built." a bit choppy
 * "This forced drivers wishing to head northbound on Howell Road to make a left turn," how so?
 * "Now because the NJDOT does not want to pay to fix the problem, the exit has been barricaded since the freeways extension was opened." - add a comma after Now or remove it.
 * "The ramp has guardrails blocking access and the NJDOT intends to bulldoze what is left." access to what? also, put a comma before and.
 * "Route 33 originally was part of the 1920s New Jersey Route 1 in parts of the road south of Hightstown and as Route 7 from Hightstown to its terminus at Route 71." Restructure. 1920's should have an apostrophe, and should not be an adjective. In parts? Be more specific.
 * "Both roads were changed into Route 33 in the 1927 New Jersey state highway renumbering." You could use a different word besides "changed."
 * "However, in 1967, the NJDOT scaled back proposals to the current seven-mile Freehold Bypass." - restructure, the sentence is ambiguous.
 * "in eastbound order." What is eastbound order?
 * "The cloverleaf ramp from Route 79 southbound to Route 33 freeway eastbound has been mostly destroyed, to make way for a new reverse jughandle for U.S. Route 9 northbound to Schanck Road." No comma. What is a reverse jughandle?
 * "The merging part of the ramp still remains abandoned along the right side of the eastbound freeway." Ramps are used for merging. What do you mean?
 * "The original alignment for the freeway east of Halls Mills Road (CR 55) can be seen now as an NJDOT maintenance shed." too ambiguous
 * "The new alignment curves to the left after the interchange, in order to avoid what the NJDOT believed to be a suspected (but never identified) turtle bog habitat." You mean a turtle bog animal? Or a bog habitat with turtles?
 * "The pavement is accessible from the eastbound on-ramp, but is fenced off." No hyphen.
 * "Howell Road was never given access from Route 33 eastbound and thus the ramp still remains barricaded off, slowly decaying." Given? Also, this is a run-on, please fix. In addition, a ramp cannot decay - it's concrete. At least, not within the next century- find a better word.
 * "There are many future developments for Route 33." redundant
 * "Heavy traffic and recent studies hint at a possible widening of Route 33 all the way to Route 34 in Wall Township, however this is still only in the proposal phase." - run-on, and traffic does not hint at widening, only that it is needed.
 * "Monmouth County is performing a corridor study on Route 33 to determine if any action should happen." action of what sort?
 * "e Collingwood Circle is scheduled for replacement with a smaller roundabout, starting Fall 2006." MOS hates season names, and season names are not capitalized regardless. Also, it's already started... get updated info?
 * "but with such heavy traffic on both Route 33 and Route 34." .... what? Don't end your sentence with a incomplete subordinate clause.
 * "It does not seem likely that this will solve the congestion issue and the NJDOT will likely reconstruct it a decade from now like the former Route 35 and Route 36 Circle in Eatontown." - speculation
 * "There is a planned Route 33 bypass of Robbinsville Township that will run from Washington Boulevard and link up with U.S. Route 130 at South Gold Drive." It's bypassing Route 33?
 * "The former alignment of Route 33 will likely become a Main Street for the new Washington Town Center." - speculation...
 * "On December 31, 2006, the Turnpike Authority released its proposals regarding Interchange 8." exit 8? Regardless, don't capitalize it.
 * "133 bypass" don't use such a colloquial name
 * "DOT officials" What is DOT?


 * Oppose The lead needs a lot of work, should be an overall summary of the article, it doesn't mention the history or future sections at all. Also need to change the bulleted part of the history, put into prose.  --Holderca1talk 01:45, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, why is the junction list split into three separate tables? Should be combined into one table.  --Holderca1talk 13:51, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * One is an exit list table. In hindsight, this should be moved to its own section and the major intersections combined (and I know, I was the one who suggested this setup, sorry about that). --Rschen7754 (T C) 23:50, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The setup that you guys are suggesting right now is debatable, since I'd prefer continuity than separation. Northenglish and a few others (can't remember which) supports it.  哦，   是吗？  (User:O) 19:38, 17 November 2007 (GMT)
 * All of the CASH articles that have been set up for ELG use this format. --Rschen7754 (T C) 19:45, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * That doesn't mean it applies here. 哦，   是吗？  (User:O) 20:24, 17 November 2007 (GMT)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.