Wikipedia:WikiProject User warnings/Testing/Draft space

This is the draft space for the Wikiproject User warnings testing task force. Members of UWTEST, please feel free to tinker with the language of the templates below or draft entirely new versions of the templates. You can also discuss changes on the talk page, but don't be afraid to be bold!

Current Afc decline
Your submission at Articles for creation  You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!

Test 1 (short, simplified) Afc decline
Your submission at Articles for creation Thank you for your article submission. Another editor reviewed your article and left some comments for you. Right now we feel that it still needs some work before it can be included in Wikipedia. Feel free to keep working on the article and when you're ready, you can resubmit it by [ clicking here] and saving the page.

Thanks again for contributing to Wikipedia!

Draft 2 Afc decline
Your submission at Articles for creation  Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation! Your article still needs a little work before we put it into Wikipedia mainspace. Your draft is now located at Wikipedia&, and the reviewing editor will have left you some notes on how to improve it further. Feel free to ask them for further guidance on their talk page, and please resubmit the draft in due course. (To resubmit the draft, just add to the top of the page.)

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

Draft 3 Afc decline
Your submission at Articles for creation  Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation! Your article still needs a little work to get it ready for Wikipedia mainspace. Your draft is now located at Wikipedia&, and the reviewing editor will have left you some notes on how to improve it further. Feel free to ask them for further guidance on their talk page, and please resubmit the draft in due course. (To resubmit the draft, just add to the top of the page.)

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

Draft 4 Afc decline
Your submission at Articles for creation  Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation! Your article still needs a little work to get it ready for Wikipedia mainspace. Your draft is now located at Wikipedia&, and the reviewing editor will have left you some notes on how to improve it further. Feel free to ask them for further guidance on their talk page, and please resubmit the draft in due course. (To resubmit the draft, just add to the top of the page.)

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

Test 2 (graphical) Afc decline
Your submission at Articles for creation  Your article submission has been reviewed!  Please view the comments left by the reviewer as guidance, not judgement, and feel free to edit the article, addressing the issues raised. When you're ready, you can resubmit it for further review by [ clicking here] and saving the page. We care a lot about the quality of every Wikipedia article, and we really appreciate all your hard work to make the encyclopedia even better.Congratulations on becoming a Wikipedian, and happy editing!


 * Cleaned up html and styles in the same way as the lower template (draft 3 afc talk (the gold one)).  fredgandt  05:42, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above comment should be inside the collapsible archive, but isn't and for some reason won't behave. Also the draft it refers to is broken by the collapsible wrapper, so looks odd.  fredgandt  22:59, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Current Afc talk
Your submission at Articles for creation <div style=" border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em;	padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em;	color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-left: 1.5em; width: 90%; "> ___, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. Thank you for helping Wikipedia!
 * The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
 * Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

Test 1 (short, simplified) Afc talk
Congratulations! , which you submitted, has been created. Thank you for contributing to a free encylopedia.

If you'd like to start more articles without waiting for review, you can register an account. Doing so has many benefits, and is free. If you would like to help us improve the Articles for Creation process, please consider

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia. We hope you'll stick around, because there's always lots more to do.

Test 2 (graphical) Afc talk
Your submission at Articles for creation

<div style="border-color:#aae1ff;border-style:solid;border-width:2px;border-radius:15px;box-shadow:#ddd 2px 2px 8px;padding:15px 15px 15px 0px;background-color:#f3f3f3;margin:20px 0px 20px 0px;">  Congratulations! ___, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created and assessed as Stub-Class. If you'd like to keep working on it, you might want to check out our grading scheme for tips on what you might improve to make it an A-class or even featured article. As a registered editor, you should feel free to create articles yourself. If you'd like help with that or anything else, please leave a message at the Help desk. If you would like to help improve the Articles for Creation process, please consider Thank you for becoming a Wikipedian! Happy editing!
 * I think this wording it a bit terse and lacks guidance, but am not sure how far to take it. I know! Be bold. I'm very, very tired.  f<i style="color:#0dd;font-size:60%;">red</i>g<i style="color:#0dd;font-size:60%;">andt</i> 
 * Wow, I love this! :) Might tweak some of the wording, but appearance-wise, it's awesome. Thanks, Fred (and everyone else who's been playing around with these templates!). Maryana (WMF) (talk) 19:24, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Draft 3 Afc talk
Your submission at Articles for creation

<div style = "border: 2px solid #aae1ff; border-radius: 15px; box-shadow: 0px 2px 10px #bbb; background-color: #f3f3f3; margin: 15px 0px 15px 0px; padding: 5px 15px 0px 15px;"> <p style = "font-size: 170%;">Congratulations! <p style = "font-size: 130%;">___, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created and assessed as Stub-Class. Other editors will now join you in improving this article. You might want to check out this page for tips on what you might improve. Wikipedians aim to raise the standard of all articles to "good" or "featured article" status, but there's no rush. Now that you're familiar with how articles are created, you should feel free to create articles yourself. If you'd like help with that or anything else, please leave a message at the Help desk and multiple editors will try to assist you. If you feel the Articles for Creation process could be improved, please .<p style = "font-size: 130%;">Thank you for becoming a Wikipedian. Happy editing!


 * I feel the line "Other editors will now work on improving the article, but so can you!" implies that the user should back off. Perhaps a compromise could be: "Other editors will join you in improving this article now it is fully fledged."?  f<i style="color:#0dd;font-size:60%;">red</i>g<i style="color:#0dd;font-size:60%;">andt</i>  00:51, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I've cleaned up the styles (I mean technically) and fiddled with the structure to keep everything roughly ordered. Different screen sizes and font sizes will change the layout, so there really is not "right" way. The closest we can get is by using padding and margins to even things out and rely on default behaviour as with . I did tweak that one sentence I mentioned above too (won't try to sneak it by you).  f<i style="color:#0dd;font-size:60%;">red</i>g<i style="color:#0dd;font-size:60%;">andt</i>  05:36, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Current Afc onhold
<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;padding-bottom:0.5em;width:20em;color:black;margin-bottom: 1.5em;margin-left: 1.5em;width: 90%;"> Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your draft submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please take a look and respond if possible. If there is no response within seven days, the request may be declined. If this happens, please feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it when you believe the concerns have been addressed. (To resubmit the submission, add the text <tt>  </tt> to the top of the page)


 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!

Test 1 (short, simplified) Afc onhold
Your submission at Articles for Creation

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your draft has been reviewed, however, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please take a look and respond if possible.

If you need any assistance, you can ask at the help desk or via live chat. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!

further proposed drafts (just the text)
"Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!" and similar may be added ad. lib. Declined:

Your recent submission to Articles for Creation still needs some work. It is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/__. Please examine it to see the reviewer's comments  Try to edit the submission to address the issues,  and resubmit when you feel you have resolved them. (to do this, add  to the top of the article.)

Accepted:

Congratulations! ___, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been marked as Stub-Class on its  talk page___. Take a look at our grading scheme grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.

Please continue making quality contributions; since you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't need to post a request.


 * Note: I'n not actually happy with WikiProject Council/Assessment FAQ as a landing point,  because   much is extraneous to the present purpose, and the part that is to the purpose needs to be un-hidden by the reader to become visible. Alternatively, there's Writing better articles, which, although excellent advice,  is probably too detailed for this point in development of a beginning editor.  New p, perhaps: WP:Expanding a stub.    DGG ( talk ) 22:53, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm hesitant to create yet another policy page, but I think you might be right about this. Actually, WP:Good article criteria is really a nice, succinct guide. Maybe that instead? Maryana (WMF) (talk) 19:44, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

In development: preliminary drafts stage

 * ImageTaggingBot
 * CorenSearchBot