Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20170102/Feature

Feature: High Scores - A New Article Leaderboard
 Submitted by Thibbs 

This quarter the WP:VG Newsletter looks at a select number of our most prolific content creators - the article-makers. Each article is of course written by teams of editors and the bulk of the work required to guide the article from Stub to Start to Good or Featured class may come years after the article is originally created. But the original act of article creation does mark a tangible point of origin and represents a public declaration of the notability and encyclopedia-worthiness of each topic. Not all of these public declarations are borne out in time, and many articles listed at WP:VG/NAA are today redlinks again, but in this feature we celebrate simply the boldness required to start a new article - a small step more intimidating than even that initial and primal barrier - clicking the edit tab on an existing article for the first time.

WP:VG's first New Article Announcement (NAA) was made in August 2006. NAAs first began to be published in the Newsletter in May 2008, and specific monthly NAA charts first began to appear in the third quarter of 2009... But this only represents a part of the story. WP:VG predates the earliest NAA by 30 months, and it shouldn't come as much of a surprise to learn that video-game-related articles (i.e. articles that today fall within WP:VG's remit) have been created since nearly the dawn of Wikipedia. Wikipedia was founded on 15 January 2001, and its oldest known article dates to the 16th. This last December, a brief investigation into WP:VG's oldest articles was conducted with the kind advice and assistance of local Wikipedian historian, Graham87, and it now seems clear that the WP:VG's earliest articles date back to March 2001. Details of which exact article is the oldest (as well as details regarding the first video game articles nominated for AfD) can be read here. A new historical "2005-2001" section has been added to WP:VG/NAA with full coverage of video game articles published during Wikipedia's first year (2001) and with hopes of expanding retroactive announcements for video game topics falling within the 55-month period from January 2002 through July 2006 (and representing more than 25% of Wikipedia's history of publishing video game articles).

Despite the incompleteness of the record, the Newsletter has undertaken this quarter to present readers with a partial leaderboard. In the chart below we are publishing the usernames of those among us who have created the greatest number of new articles so far (usernames are only published for 10 or more newly created articles). This chart contains WP:VG members and non-members alike. It covers 7205 unique editors and includes everyone from the early IP editors (from the period when IP editors were allowed to create articles) to regular longterm editors, from blocked and banned accounts to current and former ArbCom members, and all the way up the chain to one of the co-founders of Wikipedia. If and when historical data from January 2002 through July 2006 can be examined and published at WP:VG/NAA, those results will be included in the newsletter either as an update to this feature or as a stand-alone feature.

NOTE: An attempt was made to merge article counts for users with alternate names (e.g. the contributions of User:Salvidrim and User:Salvidrim!), but not all such accounts may have been merged. Please leave a comment at the bottom if any username totals may need to be increased due to the use of alternate accounts.

And finally just for the sake of amusement, let us spotlight a few of the contributions made by prominent Wikipedians who may not normally be associated with WP:VG. The following short table lists articles contributed by a variety of Wikipedia's Arbitrators, WMF Board members, and Wikipedians in Residence. It is very encouraging to recognize that those who enforce our policies and establish our principles have been down in the trenches going through the same editorial processes and have shown an interest in the topic area in which most WP:VG editors have chosen to edit. It would be nice to see more of this in the future!