Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Peer review/Ninja Gaiden III: The Ancient Ship of Doom

Ninja Gaiden III: The Ancient Ship of Doom
Another big push from me, to finish out the NES Ninja Gaiden trilogy. Just a basic look over the grammar and prose and see if it's fine; I'm sure there will be a few errors as I stayed up rather late last night trying to finish it. I could probably shorten the lead by just a bit if anybody has ideas how (it shouldn't be bigger than the one for Ninja Gaiden (NES), but it's hard to try and include a basic summary of every little thing throughout the article and keep it at two full paragraphs or three short paragraphs). A double-check of the Plot section would also be appreciated, as I seem to be getting longer with describing the plot progressively with every title in the series (went from 4 paragraphs in Ninja Gaiden II: The Dark Sword of Chaos to 5 here). –MuZemike 03:01, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Just thought I'd mention that Electronic Gaming Monthly put their original review of the Lynx version online in ~2004, and I managed to dig it up while working on the online print archive. Here's a link; hope it's helpful. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 20:56, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, I already got that in there, just that I didn't have the ratings or the authors. All four basically said the same thing, so I just added one more sentence there. –MuZemike 14:12, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Glad it was of some use, at least. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 01:43, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The right-justify gameplay image looks... weird. Any reason it can't be left-justify? --Teancum (talk) 12:41, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The same problem I've had with the other two Ninja Gaiden articles, basically. What I did for Ninja Gaiden (Nintendo Entertainment System) eventually was to move the image down to the Plot section. Otherwise, if I left-align in the Gameplay section, the text will be sandwiched between the infobox and the image, which is not good for layout. –MuZemike 18:36, 6 November 2010 (UTC)