Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/California State University Fullerton/Gender and Technoculture (Spring 2021)

Most broadly, this course looks at the ways in which our technologically mediated world influences our understanding of gender.

For this assignment, students will be making contributions to Wikipedia specifically designed to correct the well-documented gender, heterosexual, white, and Western bias in this extremely influential resource.

Week 1
Please review the wikipedia assignment prompt, located at the top of the modules page of our course Canvas.

Our course has been assigned a Wikipedia Expert. You can reach them through the Get Help button at the top of this page.

This week, everyone should have a Wikipedia account.

Week 2
It's time to dive into Wikipedia. Above, you'll find the first set of online trainings you'll need to take.

You will also need to review the following handouts &amp; readings:


 * Editing Wikipedia pages 1–5
 * Evaluating Wikipedia

Week 3
Review page 6 of your Editing Wikipedia guidebook then peruse these pages and choose a Wikipedia editing project*:


 * Wikipedia:WikiProject Feminism/Open tasks
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:United_Nations_biography_stubs
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Women%27s_rights_activist_stubs
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Women%27s_history_stubs
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Stub-Class_Women_scientists_articles
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Feminism_stubs
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Stub-Class_WikiProject_Women_articles
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Indigenous_peoples_of_North_America_stubs


 * Or, you can also peruse Wikipedia on your own and identify an article that demonstrates either gender, heterosexual, racial or other Western biases. Check the page's &quot;Edit&quot; page to make sure it is not under any protected status, which would limit your ability to edit it! Also, you MUST read through the article's &quot;Talk&quot; page to become familiar with the work of other editors watching this page before you edit!

Choose 1-2 potential articles that you can tackle and email them to me for approval. Don't forget, for articles that already exist, check the Talk page to see what other Wikipedians might be doing. '''

'''

Please email me for the ok!

Week 4




Carefully read through the page's History Page and Talk Page so you understand how the Wikipedia community has been working with this topic. Then, do your research! Gather all citations that you will be using to document your corrections and additions and, compile all edits and citations in a Word document (which you will turn in along with your reflection paper!).

While you work, you should also compile a list of relevant, reliable books, journal articles, or other sources. Post that bibliography to the talk page of the article you'll be working on, and in your sandbox. Make sure to check in on the Talk page to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography.

While you read through your article, consider some questions (but don't feel limited to these):


 * ** Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Check the &quot;talk&quot; page and the &quot;view history&quot; page. What kinds of conversations is the Wikipedia community having about how to represent these issues? How has the article changed over time?

Week 5
You've picked a topic and found your sources. Now it's time to start writing. To start, take the online trainings linked below. Then, continue to build your draft. Remember, you'll need to gather all citations that you will be using to document your corrections and additions and, compile all edits and citations in a Word document as well as be working on your draft in your sandbox. Later, you will turn in your word document with your draft and your citations with your reflection paper!.





'''Creating a new article?

'''


 * Write an outline of that topic in the form of a standard Wikipedia article's &quot;lead section.&quot; Write it in your sandbox.
 * A &quot;lead&quot; section is not a traditional introduction. It should summarize, very briefly, what the rest of the article will say in detail. The first paragraph should include important, broad facts about the subject. A good example is Ada Lovelace. See Editing Wikipedia page 9 for more ideas.

'''Improving an existing article?

'''


 * Identify what's missing from the current form of the article. Think back to the skills you learned while critiquing an article. Make notes for improvement in your sandbox.

Keep reading your sources, too, as you prepare to write the body of the article.

Resources: Editing Wikipedia pages 7–9

Reach out to your Wikipedia Expert if you have questions using the Get Help button at the top of this page.

Resource: Editing Wikipedia, pages 7–9

Women's Studies

Everyone has begun writing their article drafts.

Week 6
Carefully read Wikipedia's &quot;neutral point of view&quot; policy here and Wikipedia's &quot;Don't-Give-a-Fuckism&quot; page here.

It's time to move your work live - to the &quot;mainspace.&quot;
Make your edits!!! Be sure you are keeping with Wikipedia's guidelines, particularly Neutral Point of View and No Original Research, both of which can be tricky to catch. Also, be sure to cite all your changes/additions! See the &quot;&quot; Wiki pamphlet if you're unsure of what this means: Be sure to explain each edit in the box provided at the bottom of the editing window!

'''Editing an existing article?

'''


 * NEVER copy and paste your draft of an article over the entire article. Instead, edit small sections at a time.
 * Copy your edits into the article. Make many small edits, saving each time, and leaving an edit summary. Never replace more than one to two sentences without saving!

'''Creating a new article?

'''


 * Read Editing Wikipedia page 13, and follow those steps to move your article from your Sandbox to Mainspace.
 * You can also review the Sandboxes and Mainspace online training.

Exercise
Add links to your article

Now's the time to revisit your text and refine your work. You may do more research and find missing information; rewrite the lead section to represent all major points; reorganize the text to communicate the information better; or add images and other media.

You are also editing in response to any concerns, questions or revisions from the Wikipedia community. I will be assigning each of you a peer's article to review--please make sure you do so in a timely fashion!


 * Don't forget that you can ask for help from your Content Expert at any time!

Week 8
Please refer to the week 7 trainings for more information on the peer review process.

Week 9
Continue to expand and improve your work, and format your article to match Wikipedia's tone and standards. Remember to contact your Wikipedia Expert at any time if you need further help!

It's the final week to develop your article.


 * Read Editing Wikipedia page 15 to review a final check-list before completing your assignment.
 * Don't forget that you can ask for help from your Wikipedia Expert at any time!

Week 10
Everyone should have finished all of the work they'll do on Wikipedia, and be ready for grading.

REFLECTIVE ESSAY REQUIREMENTS:

Your essay should be 2-5 pages (12-pt font, double spaced) and should be college-level grammar and writing.

In this essay you should describe your Wiki editing experience. In doing so, you should discuss the following:


 * What have you learned about how Wikipedia functions?
 * What have you learned about how &quot;knowledge&quot; is produced?
 * How did you come to recognize the biases you helped to correct in Wikipedia?
 * Are the biases in Wikipedia different than biases in other texts (i.e. text books, literary works, photographs, etc.)?
 * How do you feel about Wikipedia as a source of knowledge in comparison to other kinds of texts?
 * What were your interactions with the Wiki editing community like and what might these tell us about the bias documented in Wikipedia?


 * Don't forget to include a copy of your Wikipedia contribution(s) at the end of your reflective essay (either highlight your changes or change the font color so it is easy for me to see the work you've done)--due via Canvas link on Sunday, April 4th by 11:59 pm.'''

'''