Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Mills College/The Queer Encyclopedia (Spring 2018)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This Course Wikipedia Resources Connect
Questions? Ask us:

contact@wikiedu.org

Course name
The Queer Encyclopedia
Institution
Mills College
Instructor
Rebekah Edwards
Wikipedia Expert
Shalor (Wiki Ed)
Subject
(Queer) Encyclopedic Knowledge Production
Course dates
2018-01-15 00:00:00 UTC – 2018-04-29 23:59:59 UTC
Approximate number of student editors
11


A central concern of this class is knowledge production: how is knowledge produced, by whom and with what consequences? We will take as our central object of investigation the “encyclopedia” -- exploring its history, biases, cultural influence and current modes of production. We will read and discuss queer theory/history and use it as a lens for thinking critically about encyclopedic knowledge production.

We will spend much of the semester producing knowledge and interrogating its production through active engagement with Wikipedia. We will complete the Wikipedia editorial training and as we do so, work on updating and adding entries on Queer, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender biographies, events, places and resources. Adding entries about marginalized topics to Wikipedia is considered by many to be a form of activism (e.g.: last year multiple “Art + Feminism Edit-A-Thon” events were organized across the country to address the gender bias in Wikipedia). This class will hold our editing work as a form of community engagement; our work will help to increase representation of Queer and LGBTIA topics in Wikipedia and facilitate greater visibility for, and access to information about, these communities. We will join with the Mills Art Museum and the Mills Library in organizing the first “Art + Feminism Edit-A-Thon” event to be held at Mills college.

We will also discuss the efficacy of encyclopedic practice as a form of queer knowledge production. We will discuss the ways in which encyclopedic practices of classification and collection, fundamental practices of scientific and legal systems, have produced ideas of normative bodies and lives, ideas that have often been used with violent consequences to disenfranchise people categorized as non-normative. We will discuss the politics of encyclopedia exclusion and inclusion, exploring the ramifications of assimilation, respectability, vulnerability, accessibility, legibility, and accountability. We will discuss forms of queer knowledge production that are not encyclopedic: strategies and practices among queer, non-normative communities for transmitting information about queer lives, resources, possibilities and histories outside of institutional forms.

Student Assigned Reviewing
Bartholomew.higgans
Alliemallie Reciprocal IVF National Youth Pride Services
Tallulabay Syd (singer), Category:Lesbian musicians, Sins Invalid
SacSkywalker Category:LGBT youth organizations based in the United States
Pinkpurpleblue Mal Blum, Jazz Jennings, Bisexual Erasure, Andi Mack, When We Rise, Crazy Ex-Girlfriend (TV series)
DevDefiance
Ktwombs Dys4ia, Queers in Love at the End of the World
ShibaNoodle Carolina de Robertis, Zoe Tuck
Aal0035
MGMoore Melanie Cervantes
OaklandManualofStyle
FWOroom105

Timeline

Week 1

Course meetings
Monday, 15 January 2018
In class - Introduction to the Wikipedia project

Welcome to your Wikipedia project's course timeline. This page will guide you through the Wikipedia project for your course. Be sure to check with your instructor to see if there are other pages you should be following as well.

This page breaks down writing a Wikipedia article into a series of steps, or milestones. These steps include online trainings to help you get started on Wikipedia.

Your course has also been assigned a Wikipedia Expert. Check your Talk page for notes from them. You can also reach them through the "Get Help" button on this page.

To get started, please review the following handouts:

Assignment - Get started on Wikipedia
  • Create an account and join this course page, using the enrollment link your instructor sent you. (To avoid hitting Wikipedia's account creation limits, this is best done outside of class. Only 6 new accounts may be created per day from the same IP address.)
  • It's time to dive into Wikipedia. Below, you'll find the first set of online trainings you'll need to take. New modules will appear on this timeline as you get to new milestones. Be sure to check back and complete them! Incomplete trainings will be reflected in your grade.
  • When you finish the trainings, practice by introducing yourself to a classmate on that classmate’s Talk page.
Milestones

By the end of the Intensive Weekend session everyone should have a Wikipedia account. 

Week 2

Course meetings
Monday, 22 January 2018
Assignment - Evaluate Wikipedia

It's time to think critically about Wikipedia articles. You'll evaluate a Wikipedia article related to the course and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's Talk page.

  • Complete the "Evaluating Articles and Sources" training (linked below).
  • Create a section in your sandbox titled "Article evaluation" where you'll leave notes about your observations and learnings.
  • Choose an article on Wikipedia related to your course to read and evaluate. As you read, consider the following questions (but don't feel limited to these):
    • Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
    • Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
    • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
    • Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
    • Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
    • Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
    • Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
    • How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
    • How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
  • Optional: Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — ~~~~.
In class - Discussion for your group meetings
What's a content gap?

 Now that you're thinking about what makes a "good" Wikipedia article, consider some additional questions. 


  • Wikipedians often talk about "content gaps." What do you think a content gap is, and what are some possible ways to identify them?
  • What are some reasons a content gap might arise? What are some ways to remedy them?
  • Does it matter who writes Wikipedia?
  • What does it mean to be "unbiased" on Wikipedia? How is that different, or similar, to your own definition of "bias"? How might a queer or feminist analysis have a different bias than wiki's or than your own? 
  • What impacts can you imagine  if someone or something can't be found in Wikipedia?

Week 3

Course meetings
Monday, 29 January 2018
Assignment - Add to an article

Familiarize yourself with editing Wikipedia by adding a citation to an article. There are two ways you can do this:

  • Add 1-2 sentences to a course-related article, and cite that statement to a reliable source, as you learned in the online training.
  • The Citation Hunt tool shows unreferenced statements from articles. First, evaluate whether the statement in question is true! An uncited statement could just be lacking a reference or it could be inaccurate or misleading. Reliable sources on the subject will help you choose whether to add it or correct the statement.
In class - Discussion for your group meetings
Thinking about sources and plagiarism
  • Blog posts and press releases are considered poor sources of reliable information. Why?
  • What are some reasons you might not want to use a company's website as the main source of information about that company?
  • What is the difference between a copyright violation and plagiarism?
  • What are some good techniques to avoid close paraphrasing and plagiarism?

Week 4

Course meetings
Monday, 5 February 2018
Assignment - Choose possible topics
  • Review page 6 of your Editing Wikipedia guidebook.
  • Look up 3-5 potential topics related to the course that you might want to update on Wikipedia. Review the content of the article and check the Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Identify one or two areas from each that you could improve.
  • Choose 2-3 potential articles from that list that you can tackle, and post links to the articles and your notes about what you might improve in your sandbox.
  • Finally, present your choices to your instructor for feedback.
In class - Discussion topic for group meetings
Choosing a topic that matters to you

Brainstorm with your group not only about the who/what of your topic but about why it matters to you to add to or create this topic in wiki? What are the "stakes" for you? 

Week 5

Course meetings
Monday, 12 February 2018
Assignment - READ the Guide(s) for writing articles in your topic area

Biographies

Books

Films

History

Linguistics

Medicine

Political Science

Sociology

Women's Studies

Assignment - Review the rules for medical topics if your topic is medical

Review Wikipedia's rules for topics related to medicine, human health, and psychology -- if your topic falls in these categories.

In class - Discussion for group meetings
Thinking about Wikipedia
  • What do you think of Wikipedia's definition of "neutrality"?
  • What are the impacts and limits of Wikipedia as a source of information?
  • On Wikipedia, all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. What kinds of sources does this exclude? Can you think of any problems that might create?
  • If Wikipedia was written 100 years ago, how might its content (and contributors) be different? What about 100 years from now?

Week 6

Course meetings
Monday, 19 February 2018
Assignment - Finalize your topic / Find your sources
  • On the Students tab, assign your chosen topic to yourself.
  • In your sandbox, write a few sentences about what you plan to contribute to the selected article.
    • Think back to when you did an article critique. What can you add? Post some of your ideas to the article's talk page, too.
    • Compile a list of relevant, reliable books, journal articles, or other sources. Post that bibliography to the talk page of the article you'll be working on, and in your sandbox. Make sure to check in on the Talk page to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography.

Week 7

Course meetings
Monday, 26 February 2018
Assignment - Draft your article

You've picked a topic and found your sources. Now it's time to start writing.

Creating a new article?

  • Write an outline of that topic in the form of a standard Wikipedia article's "lead section." Write it in your sandbox.
    • A "lead" section is not a traditional introduction. It should summarize, very briefly, what the rest of the article will say in detail. The first paragraph should include important, broad facts about the subject. A good example is Ada Lovelace. See Editing Wikipedia page 9 for more ideas.

Improving an existing article?

  • Identify what's missing from the current form of the article. Think back to the skills you learned while critiquing an article. Make notes for improvement in your sandbox.



Keep reading your sources, too, as you prepare to write the body of the article.

Resources: Editing Wikipedia pages 7–9

Milestones

Everyone has begun writing their article drafts.

Week 8

Course meetings
Monday, 5 March 2018
Assignment - Expand your draft
  • Keep working on transforming your article into a complete first draft. Get draft ready for peer-review.
  • If you'd like a Wikipedia Expert to review your draft, now is the time! Click the "Get Help" button in your sandbox to request notes.

Week 9

Course meetings
Monday, 12 March 2018
Assignment - Peer review and copy edit
  • First, take the "Peer Review" online training.
  • Select a classmate’s article that you will peer review and copyedit. On the Articles tab, find the article that you want to review. Then in the "My Articles" section of the Home tab, assign it to yourself to review.
  • Peer review your classmate's draft. Leave suggestions on the Talk page of the article, or sandbox, that your fellow student is working on. Other editors may be reviewing your work, so look for their comments! Be sure to acknowledge feedback from other Wikipedians.
  • As you review, make spelling, grammar, and other adjustments. Pay attention to the tone of the article. Is it encyclopedic?
Milestones

Every student has finished reviewing their assigned articles, making sure that every article has been reviewed.

Week 10

Course meetings
Monday, 19 March 2018
Assignment - Respond to your peer review

You probably have some feedback from other students and possibly other Wikipedians. It's time to work with that feedback to improve your article!

  • Read Editing Wikipedia pages 12 and 14.
  • Return to your draft or article and think about the suggestions. Decide which ones to start implementing. Reach out to your instructor or your Wikipedia Expert if you have any questions.

Week 11

Course meetings
Monday, 26 March 2018
Assignment - Continue improving your article

Do additional research and writing to make further improvements to your article, based on suggestions and your own critique.

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 12 to see how to create links from your article to others, and from other articles to your own. Try to link to 3–5 articles, and link to your article from 2–3 other articles.
  • Consider adding an image to your article. Wikipedia has strict rules about what media can be added, so make sure to take Contributing Images and Media Files training before you upload an image.
In class - Mills College 1st Feminism+ART Hack-a-thon!

Week 12

Course meetings
Monday, 2 April 2018
Assignment - Begin moving your work to Wikipedia

Once you've made improvements to your article based on peer review feedback, it's time to move your work to Wikipedia proper - the "mainspace."

Editing an existing article?

  • NEVER copy and paste your draft of an article over the entire article. Instead, edit small sections at a time.
  • Copy your edits into the article. Make many small edits, saving each time, and leaving an edit summary. Never replace more than one to two sentences without saving!
  • Be sure to copy text from your sandbox while the sandbox page is in 'Edit' mode. This ensures that the formatting is transferred correctly.

Creating a new article?

Week 13

Course meetings
Monday, 9 April 2018
Assignment - Polish your work

Continue to expand and improve your work, and format your article to match Wikipedia's tone and standards. Remember to contact your Wikipedia Expert at any time if you need further help!

Week 14

Course meetings
Monday, 16 April 2018
Assignment - Final article

It's the final week to develop your article.

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 15 to review a final check-list before completing your assignment.
  • Don't forget that you can ask for help from your Wikipedia Expert at any time!
Milestones

Everyone should have finished all of the work they'll do on Wikipedia, and be ready for grading.