Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/SUNY Plattsburgh/Cell Biology with Lab, Bio 401

Cell Biology with Lab, Bio 401, Fall 2016, SUNY Plattsburgh

Week 1
Orientation to what Wikipedia is and the basics of how it is used.

You need to sign up on Wikipedia, (decide on whether you want to be anonymous or not)

Week 2
Evaluate an existing Wikipedia article related to cell biology in your sandbox and include a section that you think would be helpful to put on the article's talk page. This could be the article that you chose to edit in the final assignment.


 * A few questions to consider (don't feel limited to these):
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?

 

Resources: Evaluating Wikipedia, [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Using_talk_pages.pdf Using Talk Pages ]

Week 3
Work on your critique in your sandbox and tell me when it is done so that I can take a look.

Week 4
Is it useful enough to go onto the article's Talk page? If yes, then you did it right so be bold and post it on the Talk page!

Week 5

 * Add at least one paragraph of new information to a Wikipedia article related to the class (try &quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Cell_biology_stubs&quot; for ideas). They must be backed up with 3 citations minimum to the best  scientific sources.
 * You will work with a team of three. The other two must fact check and proofread for you) and you must fact check or proof read for the others as needed.
 * Each of you must do your own article for your own separate grade.
 * You must fulfill your group role or points will be deducted (your group will be surveyed).
 * Post your contribution on the article page by Nov. 4th.

Week 6
I expect to see your edits on your article's page. It will be graded for presence and substance. The main criteria will be contribution, did you make the article significantly better?

Week 7

 * Respond to comments and edits by other editors and bots.
 * Rewrite/expand and improve your contribution
 * Comment on your teammates' contributions.
 * You will graded on how well you interact with the community.
 * politeness and civility
 * using reason and sources to back your position
 * standing up for making it right, not caving in and giving up
 * avoiding edit wars
 * do not feed the Trolls

Week 9
Final points awarded for:


 * Quality of the final contribution (40 points)
 * Feedback on your team contribution, your role as either fact checker, proof reader or technical person  (10 points)