Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Siena College/BIOL 220, Cell Biology KH (Fall 2016)

An overview of important processes taking place in eucaryotic cell.

The Wikipedia project will be worth 30 of your total points for the course.


 * 1) Complete all training modules - 5 points
 * 2) Critique an article - 10 points
 * 3) Add to an article - 15 points

Week 1
Welcome to your Wikipedia project's course timeline. This page will guide you through the Wikipedia project for your course. Be sure to check with your instructor to see if there are other pages you should be following as well.

Your course has also been assigned a Wikipedia Content Expert. Check your Talk page for notes from them. You can also reach them through the &quot;Get Help&quot; button on this page.

To get started, please review the following handouts:


 * Editing Wikipedia pages 1–5
 * Evaluating Wikipedia


 * Create an account and join this course page, using the enrollment link your instructor sent you.
 * It's time to dive into Wikipedia. Below, you'll find the first set of online trainings you'll need to take. New modules will appear on this timeline as you get to new milestones. Be sure to check back and complete them! Incomplete trainings will be reflected in your grade.
 * When you finish the trainings, practice by introducing yourself to a classmate on that classmate’s Talk page.

Week 2
It's time to think critically about Wikipedia articles. You'll evaluate a Wikipedia article, and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's Talk page.

To select an article to work on, visit the Articles tab's above and assign yourself an article to work on. Then, complete the following evaluation of your article in your sandbox space.


 * Complete the &quot;Evaluating Articles and Sources&quot; training (linked below).
 * Choose an article, and consider some questions (but don't feel limited to these):
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?
 * What is missing from the article? What could you do to make this article better?
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Choose at least 2 questions relevant to the article you're evaluating. Leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — Kennethhelm (talk) 18:26, 10 October 2016 (UTC).

Week 3
Familiarize yourself with editing Wikipedia by contributing to new content to the article you evaluated last week.


 * Take the &quot;Sources &amp; Citations&quot; &amp; the &quot;Plagiarism&quot; trainings.
 * Add a short paragraph to your article, and cite your new information to 1-2 reliable sources, as you learned in the online training.
 * Tip: if you want to practice before working live, you can draft your contribution in your sandbox first.