Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/University of Illinois at Chicago/Introduction to Filipino American Studies (Spring)

This course explores the historical and contemporary experiences of Filipinos in the U.S. and beyond, focusing mainly on race, ethnicity, gender, class, culture, and globalization. Using a cultural studies approach we will discuss how Filipino American experiences are informed by a unique set of historical circumstances, dynamics, and frameworks: Western colonialism, nationalism, immigration, neoliberalism, cultural production, labor movements, political mobilization, and identity-making. The class serves as a space for students to explore questions like: What does it mean to identify as Filipino American? How does race and racism affect the lives of Filipinos in Chicago and beyond? Through historical narratives, political cartoons, documentary film, comedy, food culture, and poetry, students will be introduced to Filipino American Studies across historical, sociological, literary, and artistic fields of inquiry.

Week 1
Welcome to your Wikipedia project's course timeline. This page will guide you through the Wikipedia project for your course. Be sure to check with your instructor to see if there are other pages you should be following as well.

This page breaks down writing a Wikipedia article into a series of steps, or milestones. These steps include online trainings to help you get started on Wikipedia.

Your course has also been assigned a Wikipedia Content Expert. Check your Talk page for notes from them. You can also reach them through the &quot;Get Help&quot; button on this page.

To get started, please review the following handouts:


 * Editing Wikipedia pages 1–5
 * Evaluating Wikipedia


 * Create an account and join this course page, using the enrollment link your instructor sent you.
 * It's time to dive into Wikipedia. Below, you'll find the first set of online trainings you'll need to take. New modules will appear on this timeline as you get to new milestones. Be sure to check back and complete them! Incomplete trainings will be reflected in your grade.
 * When you finish the trainings, practice by introducing yourself to a classmate on that classmate’s Talk page.

This week, everyone should have a Wikipedia account.

Week 2

 * Review page 6 of your Editing Wikipedia guidebook.
 * Choose 3–5 potential articles that you can tackle, and post links to them on your Wikipedia user page. For articles that already exist, check the Talk page to see what other Wikipedians might be doing. Finally, present your choices to your instructor for feedback.

'''Make sure you are logged into Wikipedia before making any postings. ''' It's time to think critically about Wikipedia articles. You'll evaluate a Wikipedia article related to your research topic, and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's Talk page.


 * 1) Complete the &quot;Evaluating Articles and Sources&quot; training (linked below).
 * 2) Choose an article related to your research topic. The article should also be a stub or start on the quality scale (check the Talk page of your article). Read your chosen not-so-good article. Then consider some questions (but don't feel limited to these):


 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?

3. On our Wiki course page, select the &quot;assign an article&quot; tab to select your chosen article for evaluating. Consider the article you have chosen to evaluate and choose at least 2 questions from the list above. Answer the questions for the article you're evaluating. Go to the Talk Page of your selected article and create a new section titled &quot;Evaluation of this article.&quot; Under this new section leave your evaluation based on questions above. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — Helaine (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:27, 1 May 2017 (UTC).


 * The deadline for completing the list above (1-3) is 5pm Friday Mar. 10.

Week 3
'''Make sure you are logged into Wikipedia before making any postings. ''' In this section you should add a small contribution to a selected article or add a citation to a claim that doesn't have one.


 * 1) Complete the &quot;Sources and Citations&quot; training (linked below).
 * 2) The Citation Hunt tool can show you some statements that don't have citations. You can use that to find an article to reference.
 * 3) Use two of your reliable sources on your research topic to add to an existing Wiki Entry on your topic.


 * You might add a paragraph that summarizes the author's argument and perspective on a topic if it is absent on the entry and/or add your source as a citation for an uncited idea.
 * When you make a small claim, clearly state the fact in your own words, and then cite the source where you found the information.
 * You will be graded on whether you accomplish the tasks above and the quality of your contribution(s).

4. The deadline for these tasks (1-3) is Monday, March 13'''. '''

Now that you're thinking about what makes a &quot;good&quot; Wikipedia article, consider some additional questions.


 * Wikipedians often talk about &quot;content gaps.&quot; What do you think a content gap is, and what are some possible ways to identify them?
 * What are some reasons a content gap might arise? What are some ways to remedy them?
 * Does it matter who writes Wikipedia?
 * What does it mean to be &quot;unbiased&quot; on Wikipedia? How is that different, or similar, to your own definition of &quot;bias&quot;?

Week 4
You've picked a topic and found your sources. Now it's time to start writing.

'''Creating a new article

Deadline: First Draft due class time, Thursday March 30, Tueday, April 4, 2017 '''

 For now keep your work contained in your Sandbox, until after peer reviews. Write an outline of that topic in the form of a standard Wikipedia article's &quot;lead section.&quot; Write it in your sandbox.   A &quot;lead&quot; section is not a traditional introduction. It should summarize, very briefly, what the rest of the article will say in detail. The first paragraph should include important, broad facts about the subject. A good example is Ada Lovelace. See Editing Wikipedia page 9 for more ideas.  Consider using Wikipedia’s Article Wizard. The Wizard is a tool designed to help users creating articles for the first time. The Wizard takes you through a six-step process with questions about the content and type of entry you will be making that will ensure that you are ready to create a new article. Write a 3-4 paragraph summary version of your article—with citations—in your Wikipedia sandbox. Then post on the Talk page of the parent article to your topic or to another one that is closely related to your topic, along with a brief summary of your plans and directing readers to your sandbox.   Begin polishing your short starter article and fix any major issues.  Keep searching for new sources and reading your sources, too, as you draft the body of the article.</li></ul> </li> <li>Be sure your Wikipedia settings are set so that you are able to watch and be notified of any comments or changes to Article, Talk, or User pages.</li> <li>Consider saving after every sentence, so if your entry is disputed, less of your work will be reverted.</li> <li>Be sure to back up every claim and statement with a citation (formatted and linked appropriately). In-text citations that include the name of the scholar making the claim are better than footnotes alone. </li> <li>Best practices include a reference to a reliable source after every sentence.</li> <li>To make citations quickly and easily, click on the word “Cite” at the top of the editing box. It will give you a drop-down menu of citation templates for books, journals, websites, and news. You can select a template and it will give you a form with all of the needed fields, and will then format the information for you. If you name the references where the template says “Ref name,” you can re-use them later by clicking on “Named references” and selecting whichever one you want. You put under references for Wikipedia to auto-generate your reference list, and if you add a number like, it will split the references up into that many columns. </li> <li>If your contribution is edited or deleted by another editor, check to see if there is an explanation of the edit on the article's talk page. If not, politely ask why it was removed. Then contact one of the course’s content experts and let them know and also let me know. </li></ul>

General tips 


 * Your article should include a number of short sections.
 * Review the gathered research materials on your topic. Categorize the content of your reliable sources and group the information into different clusters that may reflect important topic sub-categories (i.e. regional differences of Filipino American education). These will be the article's headings.
 * Headings allow a reader to jump around and find the information they want easily. (When you include a heading, a table of contents will be automatically generated when you post to Wikipedia.) Wikipedia allows the creation of article headings with relative ease.
 * Include links in your article. The linking infrastructure is what helps users navigate to and discover new information and will prevent your article from being orphaned and therefore unread. To add a link, double-bracket the word. For example, Filipino American History Month will link to the Wiki page for Filipino American History Month. If the Wiki article does not exist, then the link will appear red.
 * Good Wikipedia articles contain illustrations that help explain the topic visually. Illustrating Wikipedia.  Also, consider taking the Training Module listed below on Contributing Images and Media Files.
 * Click the “watch” button for both the article and talk page for your article. As before, be sure to continually check the article’s Talk page and any WikiProject Talk pages for user feedback and suggestions.
 * Review How to Get Help for useful advice: How to get help. Additionally, there are live tutorials on a variety of topics, which you can find at Tips and Resources

'''
 * Bring a printed copy of the items below to class.***  Thursday, March 30, 2017  '''Tuesday, April 4, 2017


 * Submission Instructions
 * You do not need to submit your Wiki Work since I can access it via the dashboard.
 * However, you must submit the following documents to Blackboard by the deadline and email them to those in your peer review group:
 * A  description of the contributions you have made. [Label the file: LastName_Firstdraftdescription.pdf (or .doc/.docx)]
 * Your article.  [Label the file: LastName_Firstdraft.docx]
 * All documents must:
 * Include your name
 * Include page numbers
 * be double-spaced (except the outline, which may be single-spaced)        *Baskerville font, size 14
 * be carefully proofread
 * be labeled with correct filenames.

Resources: Editing Wikipedia pages 7–9


 * On the Students tab, assign your article to yourself.
 * In your sandbox, write a few sentences about what you still plan to contribute to your article.
 * Think back to when you did an article critique. What can you add? Post some of your ideas to the article's talk page, too.
 * Compile a list of relevant, reliable books, journal articles, or other sources. Post that bibliography to the talk page of your article and in your sandbox. Make sure to check in on the Talk page to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography.
 * Compile a list of existing Wiki articles that are related to your topic. Are there areas within the body of your article to link to these existing articles? If so, create links to these Wiki articles in order to improve the traffic to your article.

Review Wikipedia's rules for topics related to medicine, human health, and psychology.


 * Blog posts and press releases are considered poor sources of reliable information. Why?
 * What are some reasons you might not want to use a company's website as the main source of information about that company?
 * What is the difference between a copyright violation and plagiarism?
 * What are some good techniques to avoid close paraphrasing and plagiarism?

Everyone has begun writing their article drafts.

Week 5

 * Keep working on transforming your article into a complete first draft. Get draft ready for peer-review.
 * If you'd like a Content Expert to review your draft, now is the time! Click the &quot;Get Help&quot; button in your sandbox to request notes.


 * What do you think of Wikipedia's definition of &quot;neutrality&quot;?
 * What are the impacts and limits of Wikipedia as a source of information?
 * On Wikipedia, all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. What kinds of sources does this exclude? Can you think of any problems that might create?
 * If Wikipedia was written 100 years ago, how might its content (and contributors) be different? What about 100 years from now?

Week 7
Once you've made improvements to your article based on peer review feedback, it's time to move your work to Wikipedia proper - the &quot;mainspace.&quot;

'''Creating a new article '''


 * Read Editing Wikipedia page 13, and follow those steps to move your article from your Sandbox to Mainspace.
 * You can also review the Sandboxes and Mainspace online training.


 * First, take the &quot;Peer Review&quot; online training.
 * Select two classmates’ articles that you will peer review and copyedit. On the Articles tab, find the articles that you want to review, and then assign them to yourself in the Review column.
 * Peer review your classmates' drafts. Leave suggestions on on the Talk page of the article, or sandbox, that your fellow student is working on. Other editors may be reviewing your work, so look for their comments! Be sure to acknowledge feedback from other Wikipedians.
 * As you review, make spelling, grammar, and other adjustments. Pay attention to the tone of the article. Is it encyclopedic?

Due Date:  April 6, 2017   Extension until Monday April, 10, 2017

Every student has finished reviewing their assigned articles, making sure that every article has been reviewed.

Week 8
You probably have some feedback from other students and possibly other Wikipedians. It's time to work with that feedback to improve your article!


 * Read Editing Wikipedia pages 12 and 14.
 * Return to your draft or article and think about the suggestions. Decide which ones to start implementing. Reach out to your instructor or your Content Expert if you have any questions.

Do additional research and writing to make further improvements to your article, based on suggestions and your own critique.


 * Read Editing Wikipedia page 12 to see how to create links from your article to others, and from other articles to your own. Try to link to 3–5 articles, and link to your article from 2–3 other articles.

Continue to expand and improve your work, and format your article to match Wikipedia's tone and standards. Remember to contact your Content Expert at any time if you need further help!

Present about your Wikipedia editing experience.

Consider the following questions as you reflect on your Wikipedia assignment:


 * Critiquing articles: What did you learn about Wikipedia during the article evaluation? How did you approach critiquing the article you selected for this assignment? How did you decide what to add to your chosen article?
 * Summarizing your contributions: include a summary of your edits and why you felt they were a valuable addition to the article. How does your article compare to earlier versions?
 * Peer Review: If your class did peer review, include information about the peer review process. What did you contribute in your review of your peers article? What did your peers recommend you change on your article?
 * Feedback: Did you receive feedback from other Wikipedia editors, and if so, how did you respond to and handle that feedback?
 * Wikipedia generally: What did you learn from contributing to Wikipedia? How does a Wikipedia assignment compare to other assignments you've done in the past? How can Wikipedia be used to improve public understanding of our field/your topic? Why is this important?

Week 9
It's the final week to develop your article.


 * Read Editing Wikipedia page 15 to review a final check-list before completing your assignment.
 * Don't forget that you can ask for help from your Content Expert at any time!

Write a reflective essay (2 pages) on your Wikipedia contributions.

Consider the following questions as you reflect on your Wikipedia assignment:


 * Critiquing articles: What did you learn about Wikipedia during the article evaluation? How did you approach critiquing the article you selected for this assignment? How did you decide what to add to your chosen article?
 * Summarizing your contributions: include a summary of your edits and why you felt they were a valuable addition to the article. How does your article compare to earlier versions?
 * Peer Review: If your class did peer review, include information about the peer review process. What did you contribute in your review of your peers article? What did your peers recommend you change on your article?
 * Feedback: Did you receive feedback from other Wikipedia editors, and if so, how did you respond to and handle that feedback?
 * Wikipedia generally: What did you learn from contributing to Wikipedia? How does a Wikipedia assignment compare to other assignments you've done in the past? How can Wikipedia be used to improve public understanding of our field/your topic? Why is this important?

Everyone should have finished all of the work they'll do on Wikipedia, and be ready for grading.