Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/University of Oklahoma/Sex and Gender in Early Christianities (Spring 2023)

This course covers gender and sexuality in early Christian communities, including notable women, issues around women's leadership, monasteries and celibate communities, gender and martyrdom, saints' lives, etc. The Wikipedia assignment will involve creating new articles or editing/adding content to articles on notable figures, topics, and places in the course.

Week 4
Welcome to your Wikipedia assignment's course timeline. This page guides you through the steps you'll need to complete for your Wikipedia assignment, with links to training modules and your classmates' work spaces.

Your course has been assigned a Wikipedia Expert. You can reach them through the Get Help button at the top of this page.

Resources:


 * Editing Wikipedia, pages 1–5
 * Evaluating Wikipedia

Create an account and join this course page, using the enrollment link your instructor sent you. (Because of Wikipedia's technical restraints, you may receive a message that you cannot create an account. To resolve this, please try again off campus or the next day.)

This week, everyone should have a Wikipedia account.

Week 5
From Dr. S for the EVALUATE WIKIPEDIA exercise:


 * You can evaluate any article remotely related to our class topic; you are not choosing the article you will edit or write NOW. Just pick something to evaluate, and next week you'll pick your article.
 * You do not need to write a long long tome. Some of the questions on the list are yes/no.
 * Have a one or two sentences per section
 * Then the last section OVERVIEW might have a paragraph on strengths/weaknesses

This Week's unit should take 1.5-2 hours. We are not meeting on Wednesday, and the Wednesday reading is short, so you should have time.

'''THE LINK to the ACTIVITY is on PAGE 2 of the EXERCISE. Read the slides through and go back to Page 2 '''

Week 6
Biographies

History

LGBT+ Studies

Women's Studies

Week 7
Do the above exercise (short!) and then start compiling your bibliography. The above exercise provides guidance as to where to compile your bibliography in Wikipedia. You also should have your own list, as well.

Resources for research:


 * course materials
 * databases on OU Libraries site, especially JSTOR and Project Muse and ATLA
 * books on OU Libraries site (you may need to get physical books :) )

'''You should get started this week and continue to work on it next week. The &quot;due date&quot; is a placeholder for starting. ''' You will probably keep working through next week.

Week 8
Reach out to your Wikipedia Expert if you have questions using the Get Help button at the top of this page.

Resource: Editing Wikipedia, pages 7–9

Week 9
Everyone has begun working on their article drafts. What does this mean?


 * You can still compile bibliography.
 * Read your sources and make notes on what to add to Wikipedia
 * Be sure to evaluate your article for content gaps before you start writing
 * Start editing/writing in the Sandbox

To earn a Satisfactory this milestone assignment you should have:


 * List of sources formatted correctly with...
 * relevant class material
 * at least 3 highly relevant, peer-reviewed academic sources from outside of class (be sure to include any books/articles I recommended to you)
 * Have made at least one substantial addition or edit with a source in the article Sandbox
 * completed almost all exercises and modules in previous weeks

To earn an Excellent on this milestone: fulfill the above requirements, complete all exercises in previous weeks, few to no technical or formatting or spelling/grammar errors.

Week 10
Everyone continues writing their article drafts

Week 11
Make substantial edits/additions and address Dr. S's comments on your Milestone 1 evaluation (see comments in Canvas). Be ready for peer review next week!

Week 12
Guiding framework

'''Peer review due before class begins Wednesday April 12. You will discuss peer reviews in groups after the student-led discussion in class.'''

Dr. S tips and instructions for peer review:


 * Be SURE to read and KEEP OPEN in a WINDOW next to the article you're peer reviewing (not a tab so you don't have to flip back and forth) the &quot;Guiding Framework&quot; lesson -- it has all your instructions
 * You can take notes in another document on your computer or on paper and then edit and copy them over to the user talk page when you are ready
 * Be sure your comments are specific enough so that your peer can understand your point. Examples:
 * &quot;That sentence needs a citation&quot; is vague because we don't know which sentence but is specific in its instruction on what to do.
 * &quot;I don't understand this assertion: '[copied and pasted sentence from article]'&quot; is specific in copying the relevant sentence but is vague because we don't know what you mean by not understanding (grammar/style unclear? vocabulary or names that are not general knowledge that have not been introduced? no evidence for the assertion? what don't you understand)
 * try to be specific on both aspects -- what you are commenting on and what about it is working or needs improvement
 * Please do not be afraid of commenting on weak areas. No one wants to offend fellow students. But remember, suggestions for improvement made in a kind way are a gift.
 * Please be sure your comments are in the correct section (the author's User Talk Page --the Wikipedia &quot;Guiding Framework&quot; lesson tells you where it is)

You probably have some feedback from other students and possibly other Wikipedians. Consider their suggestions, decide whether it makes your work more accurate and complete, and edit your draft to make those changes.

Resources:


 * ** Editing Wikipedia, pages 12 and 14
 * Reach out to your Wikipedia Expert if you have any questions.

Note from Dr. S:


 * Response to peer review will be complete when you've replied to the message(s) your reviewer(s) left on your talk page and have made some edits to your article sandbox to address the peer review feedback.
 * Take notes during your peer review discussion in class Wednesday also
 * Responses are due Friday April 14 at noon. I will check your article sandbox and your User Talk page

Every student has finished reviewing their assigned articles, making sure that every article has been reviewed.

Every student has responded to peer review on their User Talk Page and has made one or more edits in their Article Sandbox to address one or more comments. (While responding to at least one comment is due April 14, students should continue to take into account all the comments and address all useful ones before the final article editing is due.)

No extensions for Wednesday's peer review since your peer must have your reviews to do their own work for Friday. Tokens can be used for extensions to Friday's responses.

Rubric for Satisfactory on Peer Review: fulfills at least #s 1-4 &amp; 6 below.

Excellent (earns token -- the final WP evaluation is what counts towards Excellence credits for an A in the class) fulfills all rubric criteria:


 * 1. Specific and substantial comments/suggestions on the article content of two articles by Wednesday class
 * 2. Specific and substantial comments/suggestions on the Bibiography of two articles by Wednesday class
 * 3. Comments on at least one way in which each of the articles you're reviewing are helpful for your own work by Wednesday class
 * 4. Comments/Suggestions are in the correct place (User Talk pages) and formatted and written with few errors that interfere with reading/understanding comments
 * 5. Participates in peer review discussion in class Wednesday
 * 6. Makes one or more edits by Friday to their own article in response to Peer review
 * 7. Responds briefly on their peer reviewers' comments on their User Talk page by Friday noon

Week 13
Now's the time to revisit your text and refine your work. You may do more research and find missing information; rewrite the lead section to represent all major points; reorganize the text to communicate the information better; or add images and other media.

Week 14
Continue to expand and improve your work, and format your article to match Wikipedia's tone and standards. Remember to contact your Wikipedia Expert at any time if you need further help!

Now that you've improved your draft based on others' feedback, it's time to move your work live - to the &quot;mainspace.&quot;

Resource: Editing Wikipedia, page 13

DR S. NOTE: You do not need to begin moving this week if you are not ready.You can begin moving next week.

Week 15
It's the final week to develop your article.


 * Read Editing Wikipedia page 15 to review a final check-list before completing your assignment.
 * Don't forget that you can ask for help from your Wikipedia Expert at any time!

Everyone should have finished all of the work they'll do on Wikipedia, and be ready for grading.